Peter Kharchenko wrote:
> So if I wanted to make use of a voter that needs more than one config
> attribute at the same time, would you recommend writing an alternate
> version of UnanimousBased decision manager, or is there a reason why
> Unanimous decision have to be done this way (and theref
Ben,
Thanks. I should've read the Javadoc on UnanimousBased decision manager
more closely:
> Other voting implementations usually pass the entire list of
> ConfigAttributeDefinitions to the AccessDecisionVoter. This
> implementation differs in that each AccessDecisionVoter knows only
> abou
Peter Kharchenko wrote:
> I am writing a custom voter implementation and have a question
> regarding how configuration attributes are being fed to the voters.
Hi Peter
Basically the AccessDecisionVoter.supports(ConfigAttribute attribute)
method is structured the way it is because we want
Abstr
marc antoine garrigue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm still not confident with this bug since it introduces a major change in
> context initialization; my implementation introduces a
> SecurityContextFactory and all ContextHolderStrategy implementation (that
> now use this factory).
> I think there is
Scott Battaglia wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I've been looking at SEC-348
Hi Scott
I read through the issue in more detail and made the following comment.
I have bumped it to 1.0.3 as noted in the comment. We'll see if the
reporter provides a configuration file or more info:
"I suspect there is a misconf
