Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ben Alex
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really
Serializable?
Hi Shishir
Shishir K. Singh wrote:
>S
Patrick Burleson wrote:
Thank you very much. Going to test it out today. Any ideas on the
schedule for 0.6?
Hi Patrick
Acegi Security 0.6 will be released very soon. I'm just awaiting a
Spring 1.1 RC to check everything still works.
Best regards
Ben
---
eloper] Is Authentication not really
Serializable?
Ben,
I was wondering if the context variable in DaoAuthenticationProvider
could be made protected or better yet, have a getContext() method. Sub
classes extending the provider then can provide their own custom events
if necessary.
I just added to
Same goes for forcePrincipalAsString.
-Original Message-
From: Shishir K. Singh
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really
Serializable?
Ben,
I was wondering if the context v
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick Burleson
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is Authentication not really
Serializable?
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:40:09 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> H
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:40:09 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Patrick
>
> I've just made Authentication Serializable in CVS HEAD.
>
> Best regards
> Ben
>
Ben,
Thank you very much. Going to test it out today. Any ideas on the
schedule for 0.6?
Thanks,
Patrick
--
Patrick Burleson wrote:
It would appear to me that the Authentication isn't Serializable and
thus gets rejected from my session on Weblogic (well, I get a warning
that it will be upon redeployment). Is this intentional?
Hi Patrick
I've just made Authentication Serializable in CVS HEAD.
Best rega
It would appear to me that the Authentication isn't Serializable and
thus gets rejected from my session on Weblogic (well, I get a warning
that it will be upon redeployment). Is this intentional?
Thanks,
Patrick
---
This SF.Net email sponsored
