Thanks guys, yeah, I ended up adding the "ROLE_" to my roles in the
AuthenticationDAO implementation. It might be worth making the error
message that gets thrown a little more informative. "Unsupported
configuration attributes: [BLOGGER]" had me scratching my head.
Cheers and thanks for the hel
I'm doing something similar in my AuthenticationDao implementation. Since all
the roles are stored in the DB without the "ROLE_" prefix (and usually in
lower case), I simply convert them in my Dao before returning to Acegi:
---
public User loadUserByUsername(final String username) throws
User
;Daniel Washusen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Is the "ROLE_" prefix required for all
roles?
> Hi All,
> I've been mucking around Acegi for a few days now and I'm c
Daniel Washusen wrote:
Hi All,
I've been mucking around Acegi for a few days now and I'm curious the
the "ROLE_" prefix, that, as far as I can tell is mandatory. Can
anyone confirm this?
If I make my role deffinitions look like "/secure/**=ROLE_BLOGGER" it
seems to work fine, but if I specifiy a r
Hi All,
I've been mucking around Acegi for a few days now and I'm curious the
the "ROLE_" prefix, that, as far as I can tell is mandatory. Can
anyone confirm this?
If I make my role deffinitions look like "/secure/**=ROLE_BLOGGER" it
seems to work fine, but if I specifiy a role of "/secure/**=BLO
