On 08/29/2016 04:36 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Yeah, there's no reason to use U-labels here. Let's just require that
> the names be in ASCII. I don't think there's really a need to require
> anything further than that (servers can do case folding).
>
That is what this patch does, but actuall
The referenced RFCs describe punycode encoding using the 'xn--' ACE prefix.
On 08/29/2016 04:21 PM, Philipp Junghannß wrote:
> shouldnt IDNs just get Punycoded? at least that's the common standard
> for IDN stuff iirc.
>
> 2016-08-30 0:51 GMT+02:00 Roland Bracewell Shoemaker
> mailto:rol...@letse
Yeah, there's no reason to use U-labels here. Let's just require that the
names be in ASCII. I don't think there's really a need to require anything
further than that (servers can do case folding).
Note that this only affects Authorization.identifier.value for
Authorization.identifier.type == "d
shouldnt IDNs just get Punycoded? at least that's the common standard for
IDN stuff iirc.
2016-08-30 0:51 GMT+02:00 Roland Bracewell Shoemaker :
> I'd be interested in hearing peoples thoughts about this PR which adds
> language about how IDNs should be encoded by clients who wish to use
> them a
I'd be interested in hearing peoples thoughts about this PR which adds
language about how IDNs should be encoded by clients who wish to use
them as identifier values.
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/184
___
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
http
In particular, Stephen isn't re-upping, so there's an opening in the Security
Area.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
-Original Message-
From: NomCom Chair 2016 [mailto:nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 4:37 PM
T
Okay, then. We'll see if we can get consensus during early September.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews [mailto:j...@eff.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 2:36 PM
> To: Salz, Rich; R
I disagree strongly on this. I've been on vacation last week, and will
be on vacation through Sep 5, but happy to resume the conversation when
I get back.
On 08/26/2016 02:47 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> I'd like to try to close the loop on this. I'm hearing pretty broad
>> agreement here on a few p
