Really OT...
You are correct, But, it’s quite reasonable for a chair to check with the
WG to see if folks think a doc is ready for WGLC.I’ve done that for 12+
years and it’s actually not unusual to get very valid concerns raised at
this point in the process. It keeps docs from having to go
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:05:05AM +0300, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:03:14PM -0700, Roland Shoemaker wrote:
> > One thing that I forgot to bring up during the meeting was an issue
> > that was brought up with regards to the order in which the ACME-TLS-ALPN
> > and ACME-IP d
As a point of order, I'm pretty sure the chairs don't need consensus to
move to WGLC, they can just do it.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:53 PM Salz, Rich wrote:
> For context: this is draft-ietf-acme-star-03 as mentioned in the Subject
> but not the body.
>
>
>
> *From: *Rich Salz
> *Date: *Wednesd
