Hi Richard,
Thank you for the detailed review. As you note yourself, this is quite
late in the document life-cycle (the draft completed IETF LC over a
month ago), which is unfortunate, given that every one of your comments
is an actual protocol change. As far as we understand, none of them can
be
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:15 AM Thomas Fossati
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thank you for the detailed review. As you note yourself, this is quite
> late in the document life-cycle (the draft completed IETF LC over a
> month ago), which is unfortunate, given that every one of your comments
> is an act
I don’t care about the STAR acronym not bring known by those who don’t know :)
but I think Richard’s comments – most of which are, really, wordsmithing nits
of message-field names – deserve more consideration. After all, the STAR
documents didn’t get much attention from the ACME members.
From:
