Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-04

2021-08-13 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi Ryan! From: Ryan Sleevi Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 4:26 PM To: Roman Danyliw Cc: Brian Sipos ; acme@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-04 On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:04 PM Roman Danyliw mailto:r...@cert.org>> wrote: I think the current options might be:

Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-04

2021-08-13 Thread Ryan Sleevi
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:04 PM Roman Danyliw wrote: > I think the current options might be: > > (1) Roughly what you said above + Make it clear that this document is NOT > using the RFC5280 profile and simply reusing the data structures (but not > the validation logic). Related to this, and exc

Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-04

2021-08-13 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi Brian! > -Original Message- > From: Brian Sipos > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 5:13 PM > To: Roman Danyliw > Cc: acme@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-04 > > Roman, > Thank you for this thorough review. I want to address the more > procedural/stru