Re: [Acme] FW: [EXTERNAL] New Version Notification for draft-vanbrouwershaven-acme-auto-discovery-00.txt

2023-07-31 Thread Aaron Gable
(Apologies if you're receiving this twice; I originally sent it only to the CABForum list, instead of this IETF list.) Hi Paul, I'm sorry that I wasn't able to be at the ACME session last week; I've enjoyed reading the presentation slides and the draft notes that were taken during the session.

Re: [Acme] Practical concerns of draft-ietf-acme-ari

2023-07-31 Thread Michael Richardson
Rob Stradling wrote: >> > Ah, so a CA's Subject DN does have to be globally unique then! So >> if >> >> No, it does not. It does not even need to be unique within the CA. >> And if you think about it, if someone wants a new certificate before >> the old one expires, one

Re: [Acme] Practical concerns of draft-ietf-acme-ari

2023-07-31 Thread Rob Stradling
> > Ah, so a CA's Subject DN does have to be globally unique then! So if > > No, it does not. It does not even need to be unique within the CA. > And if you think about it, if someone wants a new certificate before the old > one expires, one needs exactly that. IssuerDN+(certificate)SerialNumber