Re: [Acme] Happy Birthday ACME!

2024-03-11 Thread Michael Richardson
I think when doing a bis document you need to ask yourself: 1) am I trying to move it to Internet Standard? -or- 2) am I trying to do ACME v2.0. (1) involves ripping out everything that wasn't implemented/used. (2) involves adding everything you forgot last time. -- Michael Richardson. o O

Re: [Acme] Happy Birthday ACME!

2024-03-11 Thread Aaron Gable
Happy birthday, RFC8555! I've thought frequently about the idea of an ACME-bis over the last few years. I have a note going since at least 2022 which I occasionally add new ideas to, and I've had a few offline conversations with others about their wishlists. At the end of the day, I think only

[Acme] Happy Birthday ACME!

2024-03-11 Thread Rob Stradling
RFC8555 was published [1] 5 years ago today! Just thinking aloud, 'cos I'm curious what folks here think... At what point might it make sense to start work on an 8555-bis? There's a fairly long list of Errata [2]: 10 Verified, 5 Reported, and 4 Held for Document Update. Would it make sense for