Richard Barnes writes:
> [...]
> In other words, there's no need for version negotiation in-band to the
> protocol.
Yeah, that makes sense.
>> The handling of "terms of service agreement" seems to be insufficient,
>> [...]
>
> This mechanism has been reviewed by multiple CAs and found to be suff
a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-acme-acme-07
Reviewer: Dale R. Worley
Review Date: 2017-10-24
IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-14
IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26
Summary:
This
