Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-12 Thread Salz, Rich
The IESG has posted a a virtual-107 schedule, it's available at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i-tbl-a8fSzqT6sl92xXdfRPDAY/ It's only a subset of the original face-to-face schedule, and their rationale is included in the message. ACME is not on the list. So let's proceed with the us

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-10 Thread Yoav Nir
The IESG are considering the options and will let us know. The intent is still to have a week of virtual meetings. After that ACME can decide if we’re participating in that, or making our own virtual interim a few weeks later. > On 10 Mar 2020, at 22:21, Mary Barnes wrote: > > So, I thought i

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-10 Thread Mary Barnes
So, I thought it was a possibility to have the week consist of all virtual meetings. Or has that been totally removed from the table? Some of us like that option as we've already blocked that week in our calendars. On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:07 PM Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > On 9 Mar 2020, at 17:11

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-10 Thread Yoav Nir
> On 9 Mar 2020, at 17:11, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote. We have volunteers to act as > chairs for us (on CC). Looking at the list below, it seems reasonable to > cancel our session. PLEASE POST IF YOU DISAGREE. Of course "they" may > decide to canc

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-10 Thread Owen Friel (ofriel)
-Original Message- From: Acme On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: 10 March 2020 05:47 To: Salz, Rich Cc: Alexey Melnikov ; acme@ietf.org; Mary Barnes Subject: Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda > draft-ietf-acme-integrations-00, ACME Integrations > Michael Richardson can p

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-09 Thread Michael Richardson
Salz, Rich wrote: > Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote. We have volunteers to > act as chairs for us (on CC). Looking at the list below, it seems > reasonable to cancel our session. PLEASE POST IF YOU DISAGREE. Of > course "they" may decide to cancel anyway,

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-09 Thread Yaron Sheffer
It would not be the first time people confused Yoav and myself. I am honored... Yaron (me) is not planning to be there, I am banned by both my company and my government. Re: STAR, Rich didn't get it completely right: the base STAR is in AUTH48 and might actually get published in the next day or

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-09 Thread Salz, Rich
That is what I get for looking at the "new draft" email from Yaron while writing mail to ACME. Ooops. On 3/9/20, 1:34 PM, "Yoav Nir" wrote: …and Yoav won’t be there either. No idea about Yaron. > On 9 Mar 2020, at 17:11, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Yaron and I cannot attend

Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-09 Thread Yoav Nir
…and Yoav won’t be there either. No idea about Yaron. > On 9 Mar 2020, at 17:11, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote. We have volunteers to act as > chairs for us (on CC). Looking at the list below, it seems reasonable to > cancel our session. PLEASE POST IF Y

[Acme] IETF 107; agenda

2020-03-09 Thread Salz, Rich
Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote. We have volunteers to act as chairs for us (on CC). Looking at the list below, it seems reasonable to cancel our session. PLEASE POST IF YOU DISAGREE. Of course "they" may decide to cancel anyway, but please post your opinion here. Let’s look at