Hi Russ,
On 25/03/2021, 20:15, "Russ Housley" wrote:
> Thomas:
>
> As I said in GitHub, I think the Abstract could be more clear. There
> are two key points. First, the certificate contains the identifier that
> is delegated. Second, that the third party has control of the private
> key, and
Thomas:
As I said in GitHub, I think the Abstract could be more clear. There are two
key points. First, the certificate contains the identifier that is delegated.
Second, that the third party has control of the private key, and the
certificate contains the corresponding public key.
All of
Hi Russ,
On 25/03/2021, 19:28, "Russ Housley" wrote:
>
> You will see my comments in those issues.
Thanks very much!
We have prepared https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/pull/167/files
Could you please review it and see if fixes your remaining concerns?
Cheers, t
> Russ
>
> > On Mar 25, 2021, at
Yaron:
You will see my comments in those issues.
Russ
> On Mar 25, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> Please see the remaining open issues from your review - we have reopened the
> GitHub issues:
>
> https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/139
>
Hi Russ,
Please see the remaining open issues from your review - we have reopened the
GitHub issues:
https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/139
https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/145
https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/146
https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/147
Thomas:
Thanks for the diff. The revised structure looks good to me. Much more clear.
Russ
> On Mar 23, 2021, at 5:58 AM, Thomas Fossati wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> A quick follow-up to try and close the issues that you could not confirm
> had been addressed because of the complexity of
Yaron and Thomas:
Comments below ...
>> Abstract: It says: "... party access to a certificate associated with
>> said identifier." This is odd wording, and it is incorrect. The
>> party needs access to the private key that corresponds to the public
>> key in the certificate, and the
Hi Russ,
Thanks very much for your clear and thorough review!
Your comments are now tracked in the following tickets:
On 14/03/2021, 22:02, "Russ Housley via Datatracker" wrote:
> Abstract: It says: "... party access to a certificate associated with
> said identifier." This is odd wording,
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Not Ready
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area
Directors. Document authors,
