[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6063] /proc/cpufreq and /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq don't exist

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6063 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 22:24 --- Did you boot with acpi=off? Full dmesg would be helpful. Better try more recent kernel (best 2.6.16-rc2 or higher, a lot ACPI changes came in there). --- You are

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5962] CPU lock up during suspend to disk

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5962 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 19:33 --- So the suspend is hang in shutdown processing. Does shutdown work in the system? --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug,

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6072] Suspend to RAM permanently "mutes" all sound - ALSA loaded or unloaded. PCI related - VIA VT8233

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6072 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional C

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5671] pci=routeirq required for successful resume from swsusp

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6099] 2 times IO slowdown in APIC enabled mode

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6099 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 18:29 --- Yes, you can look at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watc

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5671] pci=routeirq required for successful resume from swsusp

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 17:47 --- I've been testing with 2.6.16rc4 which looks like is running a new ACPI (20060127) and I've taken it through 9 swsusp/resume cycles (seven from runlevel 1 and two from r

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6111] Acpi defunct -- buttons, battery

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6111 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 16:47 --- Created an attachment (id=7448) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7448&action=view) `Error evaluating _BIF' dismissed, but `Error reading AC Adapter sta

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6111] Acpi defunct -- buttons, battery

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6111 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 15:19 --- Created an attachment (id=7445) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7445&action=view) Byte Code DSDT for placing into intitrd If you are not sure about y

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6111] Acpi defunct -- buttons, battery

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6111 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 13:48 --- Created an attachment (id=7442) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7442&action=view) DSDT as hex file to compile into kernel via kernel .config option I

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 1752] ACPI (button and lid) not working Dell Inspiron 5150 with 2.6 kernel

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- You are receiving this mail b

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 1752] ACPI (button and lid) not working Dell Inspiron 5150 with 2.6 kernel

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are rece

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6051] no fan control - Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO Pro V2030

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6051 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 11:36 --- I will report the results at the weekend. Yesterday a suse developer attached a patched dsdt file in the Novell bugtracker which you may want to have a look at: https://

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6038] hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0xff -- since 2.6.14 unless "acpi=off" - nVidia CK804

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6038 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 11:26 --- f.y.i, today tested with 2.6.16-rc4-mm1, output still the same... --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5918] an "irq 11: nobody cared message" disables irq 11 and breaks the network

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5918 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 10:37 --- can you please test with the e100 driver from 2.6.14.3 (or whatever kernel worked okay for you) e100 part was known for asserting its interrupt line at inopportune time

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6051] no fan control - Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO Pro V2030

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- You are receiving thi

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6051] no fan control - Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO Pro V2030

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6051 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 09:33 --- Created an attachment (id=7438) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7438&action=view) assign power resource to fan device Here is another DSDT patch, whi

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 6051] no fan control - Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO Pro V2030

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6051 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 09:23 --- Created an attachment (id=7437) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7437&action=view) DSDT debug patch Ok, the fan device assigned as cooling device for

[ACPI-bugzilla] [Bug 5918] an "irq 11: nobody cared message" disables irq 11 and breaks the network

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5918 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 02:10 --- Andrew Morton wrote: > Seems that your USB host controller and both e100's are all sharing the > IRQ11 line. Somehow, an e100 is asserting that line before it has > reg