[Bug 8893] Error in acpi temperature computing that makes critical trip point reach

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8893 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |

[Bug 8834] ACPI boot failure w/o CONFIG_SMP - Rocky III+ RK886EX

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8834 --- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 23:44 --- "acpi=off noapic" boots, as expected. "noapic hda=noprobe hdb=noprobe" (as above) doesn't work. "acpi_apic_instance=2" doesn't work - blanks screen. -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 301365] battery module creates lots of interrupts on MacBookPro

2007-08-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301365 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 8709] regression: EmbeddedControl AE_TIME errors, /proc/acpi/battery/* not present

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #20 from [E

[Bug 8709] regression: EmbeddedControl AE_TIME errors, /proc/acpi/battery/* not present

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|CODE_FIX

[Bug 8651] IBM Thinkpad T23 Problems: no battery information

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8651 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 21:31 --- Daniel, ECDT of this machine has /SB.PCI0.LPC.EC as full path to EC device. While the correct patch would be /_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC. This missing underscore would cause acpi_get_handl

[Bug 8709] regression: EmbeddedControl AE_TIME errors, /proc/acpi/battery/* not present

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution|

[Bug 8630] ACPI Exception (processor_core-0783): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126] - Core 2 Duo E4400

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630 --- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 18:29 --- Created an attachment (id=12464) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12464&action=view) Introduce boot option acpi=rsdt_forced Maybe XSDT has NULL entry addr

[Bug 193961] ACPI "Large Reference Count" causes infinite loop when AC unplugged

2007-08-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ACPI "Large Reference Count" causes infinite loop when AC unplugged https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193961 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

[Bug 155496] ACPI: Critical temperature reached (65 C), shutting down.

2007-08-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ACPI: Critical temperature reached (65 C), shutting down. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155496 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL P

[Bug 5768] PCI: Multiple domains not supported - 2nd PCI video card not found unless "acpi=off" - HP xw9300 workstation

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5768 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED Resolution|

[Bug 5768] PCI: Multiple domains not supported - 2nd PCI video card not found unless "acpi=off" - HP xw9300 workstation

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5768 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 15:15 --- Whoops. I left the job where I had access to this machine about a month ago. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receivi

[Bug 264077] stuck at 800MHz on AC -- Dell D510 -- SMI

2007-08-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264077#c16 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 8598] Asus M6N: no battery information in > 2.6.20

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #18 from [EMA

[Bug 8884] Hardware shutoff at 83C - HP OmniBook XE3 GD

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8884 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 8274] kacpi use up 100% CPU after thermal throttling invoked - Sony PCG-XR1G, Vaio SR17

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8274 --- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 12:20 --- If this problem went away, it would be good to find out when and why. It may be that we need to back-port a fix for users of older kernels. Akkana, You've seen the kacpid loopi

[Bug 4773] 8139too requires 'pci=routeirq' - Medion MD9580-F

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773 --- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 12:02 --- If you own this laptop, please boot Linux on it with "pci=routeirq" to work around its BIOS bug. So that we can enhance Linux automatically recognize the bug in this laptop and

[Bug 8834] ACPI boot failure w/o CONFIG_SMP - Rocky III+ RK886EX

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8834 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 11:57 --- ACPI: APIC 7F682E62, 0068 (r1 INTEL CALISTGA 604 LOHR 5A) ACPI: APIC 7F682F70, 0068 (r1 PTLTD APIC604 LTP0) ACPI: BIOS bug: multiple APIC/MAD

[Bug 4773] 8139too requires 'pci=routeirq' - Medion MD9580-F

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773 --- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 11:23 --- (In reply to comment #36) > [...] Anybody care to provide dmidecode output? > Yes, I could. But could you please give me some little more keywords what to do. So next Time wh

[Bug 6058] Suspend-To-Ram fails to wake on HP nc4010

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 10:37 --- A lot of suspend-related changes have gone in since the last September. Have anyone checked if that issue is still present or if the symptoms have changed? -- Configure bugma

[Bug 6776] S4 suspend hang - Toshiba M50

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED Resolution|

[Bug 7037] swsusp hangs on headless resume-from-ram

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7037 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[E

[Bug 7037] swsusp hangs on headless resume-from-ram

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7037 --- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 10:25 --- (In reply to comment #13) That also is my impression. I don't think there's anything more we can do about it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi

[Bug 8286] HP dv1420us -- synaptics touchpad events do not wake the laptop from suspend state

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED Resolution|

[Bug 8286] HP dv1420us -- synaptics touchpad events do not wake the laptop from suspend state

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW

[Bug 7839] boot hang unless "nmi_watchdog=0" - 2.6.19 regression - Asus M2400N (Centrino)

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7839 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|

[Bug 8834] ACPI boot failure w/o CONFIG_SMP - Rocky III+ RK886EX

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8834 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #12 from [E

[Bug 8709] regression: EmbeddedControl AE_TIME errors, /proc/acpi/battery/* not present

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #18 from [E

[Bug 3141] S1, S4 wakeup fails - Toshiba Satellite S2800-500

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3141 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzill

[Bug 8834] ACPI boot failure w/o CONFIG_SMP - Rocky III+ RK886EX

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8834 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 04:44 --- I now tested a bit more using our production kernel (2.6.20.1, SMP compiled in) and "nosmp". Please note that the transcript might be not exact, as it's typed from a scratchpad

[Bug 8911] Intel Core Duo 2: acpi_cpufreq fails to load

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8911 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 03:38 --- Created an attachment (id=12457) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12457&action=view) acpidump output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre

[Bug 8630] ACPI Exception (processor_core-0783): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126] - Core 2 Duo E4400

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630 --- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 04:07 --- I think I have the same bug as this one. Filed separately as #8911, with similar attachments (dmesg with acpi & cpufreq debug, acpidump and acpidump-20070714-debug output). /m

[Bug 8630] ACPI Exception (processor_core-0783): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126] - Core 2 Duo E4400

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugm

[Bug 8911] Intel Core Duo 2: acpi_cpufreq fails to load

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8911 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 03:59 --- Created an attachment (id=12458) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12458&action=view) acpidump-20070714-debug output Using

[Bug 8911] Intel Core Duo 2: acpi_cpufreq fails to load

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8911 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 03:43 --- This is a new computer. A piece of paper came with it insisting that it had been flashed to the latest available BIOS version. The BIOS has an option for "Enhanced Intel Speeds

[Bug 8562] Serial driver 8250 does not work with ACPI enabled in BIOS

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562 --- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 03:32 --- Created an attachment (id=12456) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12456&action=view) Boot log of 2.6.22.1 without append="acpi=noirq" in lilo.conf Communicati

[Bug 8911] Intel Core Duo 2: acpi_cpufreq fails to load

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8911 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 03:27 --- Created an attachment (id=12455) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12455&action=view) dmesg output. includes debug output from loading acpi_cpufreq -- Config

[Bug 8911] New: Intel Core Duo 2: acpi_cpufreq fails to load

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8911 Summary: Intel Core Duo 2: acpi_cpufreq fails to load Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.22.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW

[Bug 8562] Serial driver 8250 does not work with ACPI enabled in BIOS

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562 --- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 03:18 --- Created an attachment (id=12454) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12454&action=view) Boot log of Linux kernel 2.6.22.1 lilo.conf line append="acpi=noirq" --

[Bug 5328] Access to FieldObject element of Package causes exception

2007-08-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5328 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-20 01:24 --- Maybe it's NOT a bug. The code of #1 failed in "LNotEqual(Local1, 0x59)", Local1 here is of type BufferField, but the Spec 30b says in section 17.5.66, both arguments of LNotEq