http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5243
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 13:56 ---
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5243
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
> What|Removed
Hi. I have a Thinkpad T43 with a Thinkpad Dock II. I'm running on
Feisty, and there is no such file /proc/acpi/ibm/dock. I tried Gutsy
LiveCD, and the problem persists (besides that, in the latter case, not
even /proc/acpi/ibm/bay exists - but this is another thread :-)). I'm
sending the dmesg out
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8757
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 10:01 ---
> Yet, it still appears with 2.6.23, when I apply an external disk head park
> patch. When I had this problem on 2.6.22, I was also using that patch, may it
> be the cause of th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8757
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 09:54 ---
I tried kernel 2.6.23, and I do not have that problem anymore.
Yet, it still appears with 2.6.23, when I apply an external disk head park
patch. When I had this problem on 2.6.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 09:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=13180)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13180&action=view)
test the kernel using the workaround patch
Hi, Stian
Will you please test
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3757
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #9
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7578
--- Comment #93 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 06:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=13179)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13179&action=view)
acpi-cpufreq.ko loaded and debug set to 7
Again the dmesg output of an un
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7578
--- Comment #92 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 06:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=13178)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13178&action=view)
acpi-cpufreq.ko not loaded, vanilla kernel
This is the output I get on a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7531
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3165
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2934
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 01:42 ---
Hi, Stian
Will you please test it using the kernel of 2.6.22.6 ? (enable the debug
function of pci and acpi in kernel configuration).
Please boot with option of noapic apic=debu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2069
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-16 00:17 ---
Now ia32/ia64/x86_64 all support numa architecture and will get the memory
affinity by parsing SRAT. But it is different how and where to parse SRAT
table.
1.ia32 : The parse of
23 matches
Mail list logo
