http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 19:33 ---
Should that have been bug 8833 and not bug 8838?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: HP DC7700 ACPI problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251493
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 20:21 EST ---
can
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.22.9-91.fc7 |2.6.23.1
Tree|Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: HP DC7700 ACPI problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251493
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 19:39 EST ---
Ther
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 15:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=13284)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13284&action=view)
Suspend debug patch
This is the version of the patch from
http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 15:22 ---
I'm sorry, some additional patches are necessary for that to work against
2.3.23.
I'll attach a version that applies on top of 2.6.24-rc1.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzil
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8532
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 15:17 ---
This is probably going to sound like a stupid question, but can I just edit
the /boot/config file and change CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y to CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n
or do I have to recompile
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8877
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 01:36 ---
"Large Reference Count" is usually the result of recursive reference increment.
Have a look at bug 5358
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5358
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 01:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=13283)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13283&action=view)
patch for comment #7
For operation Store(RefA, RefB)
Dereference RefA and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: loading acpi-cpufreq results in general protection fault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252443
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9227
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.osdl.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2069
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2069
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 00:15 ---
Based on the comment #4, the flowchart of parsing SRAT table is related with
how memory is initialized. the IA32 and IA64(x86_64) can't use the same SRAT
parsing cide to parse SR
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-26 00:11 ---
Unfortunately it does not apply:
patch -p1 < suspend-debug-facility.patch
patching file kernel/power/main.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 27 with fuzz 2 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILE
17 matches
Mail list logo
