http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 23:22 ---
Now on 2.6.24, still no change. Is there anything else I might do to test? Or
should I wait for 2.6.25-rc1 and see what that brings?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 22:54 ---
Hi, Dennis
thanks for the info. There is an error in the comment #3:
> echo 0x04 > /sys/module/acpi/parameters/debug_layer and echo 0x0800
>
/sys/module/acpi/parame
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9792
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 19:30 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Ps: I have not compiled the kernel before. I could do it but I'll need a
> little time to go through some tutorials.
> If I could get some pointers
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 19:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=14619)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14619&action=view)
02-patch-create-sysfs-link
this patch creates a sysfs link from the acpi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 19:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=14618)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14618&action=view)
01-patch-force-offline-processor
this patch forces offline the cpu if it's
My Ubuntu server won't power off after shutdown. I have not managed to
resolve the problem, but thought I'd share my notes. My system is a P4
2.0GHz, 256MB RAMBUS RAM.
Description of the problem as follows. I try to shut down, and I get all
the normal kernel messages. The system eventually halts,
My Ubuntu server won't power off after shutdown. I have not managed to
resolve the problem, but thought I'd share my notes. My system is a P4
2.0GHz, 256MB RAMBUS RAM.
Description of the problem as follows. I try to shut down, and I get all
the normal kernel messages. The system eventually halts,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 11:06 ---
ok, this time i tried to increase verbosity of the kernel and here are the
results, i hope they are helpful, just cat /proc/acpi/event > acpi_event left a
blank file so i didnt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 11:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=14612)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14612&action=view)
lspci -vxxx (when the bug is not present)
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 11:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=14611)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14611&action=view)
dmesg when the bug is not present
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 10:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=14610)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14610&action=view)
lspci -vxxx (when the bug is present)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14535|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14534|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14533|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14532|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9827
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 03:52 ---
With the new testbios and 2.6.23.11 I get:
(...)
0170-0177 : :00:09.0
01f0-01f7 : :00:09.0
01f0-01f7 : ide0
0290-0297 : it87
0290-0294 : pnp 00:02
0295-0296 : pnp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 03:18 ---
Gigabyte replied:
Our bios engineer has open the resource for 0X290-0x29F reserved for I/O.
(and attached a test BIOS)
Would this be enough?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
18 matches
Mail list logo