http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 23:27 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> The processor goes offline, but the kernel never seems to invoke the _EJ0
> method for the CPU object, and the ACPI0007:01 sysnode tree isn't cleaned
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #31 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 22:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=14645)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14645&action=view)
use the attached tool to read from I/O port
Hi, Dennis
Will you please
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 16:23 ---
I take it back. The force-offline-processor patch doesn't seem to be working
quite right yet.
The processor goes offline, but the kernel never seems to invoke the _EJ0
method
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8573
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 16:14 ---
It is called with NULL/ACPI_ALLOCATE buffer, so it is acpi_evaluate_object, who
creates wrong size.
Also, did you notice, that ut_initialize_buffer may shrink preallocated buffe
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8573
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 16:03 ---
I've tried to reproduce this here, no luck so far.
There exists the possibility that the caller to acpi_evaluate_object is passing
in an acpi_buffer object with an incorrect l
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8734
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 12:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=14640)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14640&action=view)
requested acpidump
output of acpidump --addr 0xff810 --length 0x100
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 12:13 ---
In the configuration as per Comment #55, please do:
# echo core > /sys/power/pm_test
# echo mem > /sys/power/state
(this will test the suspend/resume sequence with busy-waiting
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 11:47 ---
Hi Rafael, I tried it, but had troubles after second time s2disk.
Any hopes for trying the -rt patch-series? And could you suggest any debugging
options that might yield useful
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8803
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 10:27 ---
Both patches seem to work as advertised. Thanks!
I still need to do some stress testing, but things now look a lot better than
they did.
I'm not sure what the protocol here i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 09:18 ---
Nice to find another person with the same bug and willing to solve it. ;-) Your
install can be helpful to perform tests... Maybe if you have Windows, you could
try the checks ab
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 06:44 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Hi,
> ACPI does not control the fans on the Acer 5315.
> There are no active cooling trip points under
> the _TZ/_TZ01 -- the only ACPI thermal zone o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #131 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 05:22 ---
Thanks for pointing that out, Jan! That BIOS update doesn't come up when i
enter the model ID of my Thinkpad (8932-A13) directly into the Lenovo support
page, so i hadn't found
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #8
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9761
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 00:30 ---
yes, it seems it works. The brightness keys works in console, so everything is
ok.
I now don't have anymore a oops in my console.
What does _ADR usually provides more ? Should
18 matches
Mail list logo
