[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #82 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 23:58 --- I don't do any work on the linux kernel myself, i'm merely a humble user like yourself :) But, it's probably due to bigger priorities i guess. -- Configure bugmail: http://b

[Bug 10279] suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279 Bug 10279 depends on bug 9998, which changed state. Bug 9998 Summary: SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|CLOSED Resolution|

[Bug 10224] kacpid and kacpi_notify takes 90 % of cpu

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: http:

[Bug 10224] kacpid and kacpi_notify takes 90 % of cpu

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224 --- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 21:00 --- Created an attachment (id=15995) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15995&action=view) patch included in linux-2.6.25-git16 shipped in linux-2.6.25-git16 729b2

[Bug 5389] Unexpected dereference of Index reference immediately passed to Method

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5389 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 from [EMAI

[Bug 5391] Unexpectedly CopyObject of immediately passed Index reference is not reference

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5391 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 from [EMAI

[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: http:/

[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 20:44 --- Created an attachment (id=15994) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15994&action=view) patch included in linux-2.6.25-git16 the attached patch shipped in linux-

[Bug 9487] buggy firmware expects four-byte IRQ resource descriptor - 2.6.21 regression - (was: Serial port disappears after Suspend on Toshiba R25)

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487 --- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 20:35 --- Created an attachment (id=15993) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15993&action=view) patch included in linux-2.6.25-rc16 The attached patch shipped in linux-2

[Bug 9772] 2.6.24-rc8 + patches: CPU hot removal while CPU is online leaves system in bad state

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 --- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 20:21 --- patch in comment #22 shipped in linux-2.6.25-git16 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Bug 6217] ACPI event that doesn't have a handler is not disabled correctly

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6217 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|CLOSED Resolution|

[Bug 9916] ACPI Error (...): No handler for Region [ECOR] [EmbeddedControl] - thinkpad X61s

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|CLOSED Resolution|

[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #81 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 14:27 --- Can someone explain to me how with the Comment #80 attachment why this can not be fixed in the kernel? It appears we know the problem and the fix. -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug 10394] [>=2.6.23][BUG] Oops on power

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10394 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 10394] [>=2.6.23][BUG] Oops on power

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10394 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 13:53 --- Sorry about the delayed response on this one. I have finally figured out the reason for this oops. I should have a patch for you to test soon. -- Configure bugmail: http://b

[Bug 10482] [2.6.25 REGRESSION] Lenovo 3000 N100 does not wake up from ACPI S3 state

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #11 from [

[Bug 10482] [2.6.25 REGRESSION] Lenovo 3000 N100 does not wake up from ACPI S3 state

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from [

[Bug 10482] [2.6.25 REGRESSION] Lenovo 3000 N100 does not wake up from ACPI S3 state

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 1752] no ACPI GPE events unless "irqpoll" - Dell Inspiron 5150

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1

[Bug 10572] Kernel panic with ACPI enabled under higher load

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 11:58 --- if you can remove any redundant hardware, please remove it so that you run bare minimum configuration -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai

[Bug 10572] Kernel panic with ACPI enabled under higher load

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 11:56 --- each crash seems to look different. can you make sure that the system doesn`t have hardware/stability issues ? memtest86? other operating system ? (& put that under load,too)

[Bug 444726] cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Rem

[Bug 444726] cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTE

[Bug 444726] cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Rem

[Bug 444726] cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTE

[Bug 444726] cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Rem

[Bug 444726] cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Rem

[Bug 81142] acpid needs a reasonable default setup (use apmscript?)

2008-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: acpid needs a reasonable default setup (use apmscript?) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81142 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 9915] backlight doesn't work correctly - Panasonic Toughbook CF-52

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915 --- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 01:15 --- Created an attachment (id=15982) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15982&action=view) dmesg output with acpi_osi="!Windows_2006" Regarding the settable brightn

[Bug 10568] ASUS P5LD2-VM, random crashes after resume.

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 02:05 --- i can't find exact commit without 100% killer aplication. I can't reproduce one crash 2 times, but every time will crash some thing other. Today i tryed to kill firefox or gcc w

[Bug 10568] ASUS P5LD2-VM, random crashes after resume.

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 01:43 --- does the problem still exist if X is not started? And it would be great if you can find the exact commit that cause this problem using git bisect. -- Configure bugmail: http:

[Bug 10503] Suspend issue on ancient asus A7V system

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10503 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 01:37 --- Created an attachment (id=15983) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15983&action=view) patch: disable pme please apply this patch and see if it works for you.

[Bug 10568] ASUS P5LD2-VM, random crashes after resume.

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 02:06 --- It seesm like some memory allocation issue. This bug is hard to reproduce with suspend after freh start. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

[Bug 5833] Add the support for alarm relative time in sysfs

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5833 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10561] Funky HPET + processor.ko + p4_clockmod.ko = repeated lockups - classmate PC

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 03:31 --- > What happens when you boot with clocksource=hpet or clocksource=acpi_pm on the > kernel command line ? Whichever one I boot with is, indeed, used from early on in the boot p

[Bug 6712] CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y prevents poweroff -- it reboots instead - tyan s2882

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #24 from [E

[Bug 10561] Funky HPET + processor.ko + p4_clockmod.ko = repeated lockups - classmate PC

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561 --- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 03:53 --- > --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 03:31 --- > > What happens when you boot with clocksource=hpet or clocksource=acpi_pm on > > the > > kernel comman

[Bug 10510] s3: interrupt storm upon resume - Asus M6700Me

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10510 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 05:30 --- Created an attachment (id=15987) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15987&action=view) lspci -vvxx output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/use

[Bug 10561] Funky HPET + processor.ko + p4_clockmod.ko = repeated lockups - classmate PC

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 04:21 --- > When you use clocksource=acpi_pm then it works with p4-clockmod, right ? No it locks up. I guess it's like when I boot with no parameter and echo acpi_pm into the current_cl

[Bug 10561] Funky HPET + processor.ko + p4_clockmod.ko = repeated lockups - classmate PC

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561 --- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 05:29 --- On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 04:21 --- > > When you use clocksource=acpi_pm then it works with p4-

[Bug 10510] s3: interrupt storm upon resume - Asus M6700Me

2008-04-30 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10510 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 05:29 --- I run a few more tests and made sure that I didn't use the Debian scripts, but put the system to sleep by hand (echo mem > /sys/power/sleep). When I remove the battery module p