http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10844
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 20:47 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Well, there's at least one bug in our restore code: we're not even bothering
> to restore the interrupt configuration!
It seems this patch is not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10657
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|1 |0
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL P
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10657
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10657
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10431
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Docking problems with Sony |surprise undock hangs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10749
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |acpi-
|bugs.osdl.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10757
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10805
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 18:13 ---
len, i think they can be shipped to acpi-test first.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from [EM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9008
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 15:42 ---
I tried the patch and the result is not ok. I have the feeling that it takes
more time before the kernel crash occurs (before it was within the 10 encodings
now It happend afte
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 15:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=16371)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16371&action=view)
Config used for the new 2.6.26rc4-zen0
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 15:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=16370)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16370&action=view)
Dmesg output with new kernel 2.6.26rc4-zen0 and acpi=off
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 15:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=16369)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16369&action=view)
Dmesg output with new kernel 2.6.26rc4-zen0 and acpi=on
--
Configure b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 15:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=16368)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16368&action=view)
Kernel crash 2.6.26rc4-zen0 with acpi patch applied
--
Configure bugma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10657
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 14:02 ---
There is no file in:
LCD brightness : /sys/class/backlight/asus-laptop/
Output switch: /sys/devices/platform/asus-laptop/
I cant load it anyway, i can either load asus_la
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10844
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 11:37 ---
Well, there's at least one bug in our restore code: we're not even bothering
to restore the interrupt configuration! It may be that disable_device (which
disables interrupts)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10749
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 11:19 ---
Hello,
the output of the new version of acpidump is the same of the one i attached,
and unfortunately the command:
# acpidump --addr 0xfdf00 --length 0x100 -o fseg
produced no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 11:10 ---
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Justin Mattock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Justin Mattock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10844
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 10:48 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Yeah, that code path has been a problem in the past. Hopefully this sort of
> thing will go away with Rafael's suspend/hibernate callback rework. In
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 10:18 ---
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Justin Mattock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:41 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.c
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10844
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 09:45 ---
Yeah, that code path has been a problem in the past. Hopefully this sort of
thing will go away with Rafael's suspend/hibernate callback rework. In the
meantime I can test whet
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 09:25 ---
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:41 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9314
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 08:24 ---
I may be a random user, but I'd like to chime in: ^_^
I've seen this very bug, on a ThinkPad X40, since at least kernel v2.6.21.
Both suspend and resume just "stop" at the poi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10749
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 02:37 ---
Hi, Riccardo
Thanks for the info.
It seems that there are a lot of ACPI error messages in the dmesg of
2.6.26-rc1 and the problem occurs in the ISMI function.
> ACPI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 01:40 ---
Hi, Walken
Thanks for the test.
From the test log we can know that the root cause is that sometimes several
events will be produced when the power button is pressed once.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10683
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 00:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=16365)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view)
Increase threshold for stray interrupts
Please also test this one.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 00:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=16364)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view)
Use msleep instead of udelay
Please test this patch first
--
Configur
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 00:37 ---
Rui,
5 was a wild guess. In theory, we should not get even 2 if the EC is working
right. Now it seems that almost all cheap machines are shipped with broken EC
and not all the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 00:25 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> > Looks promising, since I tried quick a oggenc and kernel compile together
> > and
> > no crash so far. Whereas before I could easily crash the ke
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 00:22 ---
> Looks promising, since I tried quick a oggenc and kernel compile together and
> no crash so far. Whereas before I could easily crash the kernel within
> minutes.
>
Would y
36 matches
Mail list logo