https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c39
--- Comment #39 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 00:55:57
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222663)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c38
--- Comment #38 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 00:55:22
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222662)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10884
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 23:55 ---
how about boot option libata.noacpi=1?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c37
--- Comment #37 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 00:54:44
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222661)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c36
--- Comment #36 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 00:53:49
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222660)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c35
--- Comment #35 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 00:53:16
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222659)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c34
--- Comment #34 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 00:52:31
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222658)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c33
Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 21:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=16534)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16534&action=view)
lspci -v before suspend bios v. 1.31
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=16533)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16533&action=view)
lspci -v before suspend bios v. 1.34
I wish I could give you the lsp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9526
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 19:34 ---
Hi, Dionisus
Will you please attach the output of "lspci -vxxx" before suspend and after
resume?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10807
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10807
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 17:59 ---
Hi, Dionisus
Now the patch set is already sent to acpi mail list. And it will take some
time to merge them into upstream kernel.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 16:24 ---
*Grumble*
My $LARGE_POLITICAL_ENTITY for an ICE for stuff like this.
We need to get some info out. What do we have available?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 16:16 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> No, that's not true at all. Most code segment selectors are also valid data
> segment selectors, but will trap on a write through that segment.
We
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 16:04 ---
Do we have any way to get data out of this box, e.g. a UART serial port?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 16:02 ---
No, that's not true at all. Most code segment selectors are also valid data
segment selectors, but will trap on a write through that segment.
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:59 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Something that does come to mind is if it at all possible we're not actually
> in
> real mode when this code is entered?
In that case we would get
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:57 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> How do you know it's not failing?
Because if it had failed, the kernel with the patch from Comment #10 would have
hanged, but it hangs with the pat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:50 ---
Something that does come to mind is if it at all possible we're not actually in
real mode when this code is entered?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:49 ---
How do you know it's not failing?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:34 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> It seems to me that all we have is the *assumption* that the entrypoint is at
> CS:0, which isn't inherently a given.
Indeed we assume so, but the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:27 ---
Looking at it, *how* do you know DS is actually correct?
It seems to me that all we have is the *assumption* that the entrypoint is at
CS:0, which isn't inherently a given.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:22 ---
My point is, if the value of DS is correct, then the value of SS should be
correct too, as we set them both in the same way. What am I missing?
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6217
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:21 ---
17 June 2008. Implemented another change for the GPE disable. We now perform a
read-change-write of the enable register instead of simply writing out the
cached enable mask. Thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:16 ---
What about SS?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:12 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Okay, so the stack memory or stack pointer is buggered...
Hm, well, why the value of DS is correct in that case?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:10 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> It hangs with Debug patch #2
This is consistent with your observations in Comment #13.
What happens if you comment out the "pushl $0 ; popfl" alo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 15:06 ---
Okay, so the stack memory or stack pointer is buggered...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 14:58 ---
It hangs with Debug patch #2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 14:51 ---
I have played with loop inserting.
If we insert loop before the "pushl $0 ; popfl" it hangs, but it reboots if we
insert after.
If we comment out the "pushl $0 ; popfl" it re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16528|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 13:43 ---
> Kirill, please apply the attached patch and see if anything changes, thanks.
No. It still reboots.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 11:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=16528)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16528&action=view)
Debug patch
So, if we comment out the "pushl $0 ; popfl" thing and the C
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c32
--- Comment #32 from Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-17 11:56:23 MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222566)
--> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/at
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c31
Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10919
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Video(Other)|Power-Video
Product|Drivers
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10919
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10932
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 07:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=16527)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16527&action=view)
Output of acpidump, dmesg, dmidecode, /proc/interrupts, lspci and kernel c
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 07:52 ---
I tried 2.6.26-rc6 as well. For me it seems to work perfectly. No keystrokes
were lost while reading the battery.
The interrupt count was 6 all the time.
--
Configure bugmail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10932
Summary: ACPI dead after resume
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.24.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: norma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 07:39 ---
No problem. When do you think this will go into mainline?
Should I close the bug then? I've not seen the problem anymore after using your
patch.
--
Configure bugmail: http:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10924
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||7216
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10924
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 03:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=16525)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16525&action=view)
dmesg SLAB - BUG
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 03:41 ---
Hi!
> Now, there are two problems possible and I'll have to figure a reliable way of
> verifying which of them manifests itself.
>
> First, it's possible that we are called wi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10924
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 03:41 ---
Seems like this is SLUB realted issue. I tested SLAB kernel and didn't get this
message. Instead i get this one:
[ 246.260071] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid conte
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 02:28 ---
Thanks for the test.
>From the test it seems that the power-top can work well after disableing mwait
for CPU C-states on your laptop.
I am sorry that I give the incorrect pat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10924
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 02:02 ---
I can't test regression due other supend bugs in older kernels. All i can say,
it is present in 2.6.25 too, but i have more random crushes on resume. And at
the moment is use SL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 01:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=16523)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16523&action=view)
dmesg with idlepatch
This is the dmesg with the above patch applied and
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 01:35 ---
Nope. After resume, kernel compile: temp arrived at 76C and the fan was still
at minumum speed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10223
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 01:31 ---
Oops, I mean uswsusp :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10223
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 01:30 ---
Ok, I'm testing it. Btw, now I'm using swsusp and problem occurs very rarely.
I'll report in ~week whether I can reproduce bug with your patches
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 01:07 ---
Will try. Stay tuned.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 01:05 ---
for idle=nowait dmesg tells me
[0.00] Malformed early option 'idle'
for insmod processor.ko idle=nowait it tells me
[ 261.132372] processor: `nomwait' invalid for par
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:55 ---
I've applied the patch from comment #26 to 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 on my Thinpad R51e
and while ACPI events now work (hurray! I can't rememeber if or when this
worked before :-) there
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=16522)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16522&action=view)
Thinkpad R51e 1843-6NG -- dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.k
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10857
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:42 ---
Will you please try the boot option of "hpet=off" and see whether the problem
still exists?
If exist, please capture the picture of screen when the system hangs and attach
it.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16521)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16521&action=view)
dmidecode (new BIOS)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10916
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:21 ---
Hi, Cijoml
Will you please try the boot option of "noapic" and attach the output of
dmesg?
Please attach the output of lspci -vxxx.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
64 matches
Mail list logo
