http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 23:55 ---
Yes.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #60 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 23:46 ---
This is with the patch?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 23:39 ---
I have problem with video restore so I have tried to boot with
acpi_sleep=s3_bios and acpi_sleep=s3_mode. It reboots in both case. :(
acpi_sleep=s3_beep works fine. Is it relat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 23:24 ---
It works!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 23:00 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.o: In function `wakeup_gdt':
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.S:(.data+0x0): undefined reference to
> `wak
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 22:45 ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> Created an attachment (id=16539)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16539&action=view) [details]
> Segment normalization patch (corr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10923
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 21:25 ---
Does anyone have any idea how this bug could have appeared?
I'm happy to check out certain patches or things, just don't have time for a
bisect at the moment.
And we do want
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from [EMA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 20:05 ---
Note: if the "corrected" patch works, we should tidy it up to minimize the
dependencies. In particular, if we let the kernel pre-patch the segmentation
information, we can get
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 19:15 ---
Hi, Dionisus
The workaround patch can work for you. The root cause is not gotten.
In the problem description the interesting thing for your sytem is that the
problem *
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10932
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 19:02 ---
do you have any kernel that s3 used to work?
if yes, what's the latest work kernel version?
could you please re-attach the dmesg output that with acpi.debug_level=0x0f?
--
Co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 18:58 ---
I was wondering...:
Couldn't this problem be fixed with a generic patch of some kind? At least
there should never be 20.000 + wakes per second, right?
Or is this needed so th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|PATCH_ALRE
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c51
--- Comment #51 from Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 19:27:37 MDT ---
Thomas,
Thanks for preparing the test kernel with patch from comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c50
--- Comment #50 from Yakui Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 19:17:59 MDT ---
Hi, Thomas
There is a similar bug in kernel bugzilla.
http:/
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c49
Yakui Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 15:25 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Created an attachment (id=16538)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16538&action=view)
> --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16538|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 15:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=16538)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16538&action=view)
Segment normalization patch
Segment normalization patch. Try this one o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 15:13 ---
(In reply to comment #49)
Fun, fun. :-(
Okay, perhaps I'll be able to write this patch, but since I haven't done
anything similar for years, I'll need some assistance.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 15:11 ---
Hidden parts should really be refreshed as soon as anything is written there,
but perhaps this helps? (Implementation of Rafael's idea)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wak
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 15:03 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 14:53 ---
> I wonder, what happens if we load %ss with 0 initially and then with the %cs
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 14:53 ---
I wonder, what happens if we load %ss with 0 initially and then with the %cs
value? The null selector is invalid in protected mode so that might cause the
CPU to wipe out the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 14:25 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (In reply to comment #45)
>> What happens if you change "(%bx)" to "%ss:(%bx)"?
>
> Reboot.
Okay, it's definitely %ss being buggered, and the only
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 14:16 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> What happens if you change "(%bx)" to "%ss:(%bx)"?
Reboot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 14:02 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 13:59 ---
> (In reply to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 13:59 ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> Created an attachment (id=16537)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16537&action=view) [details]
> Debug patch #5
It hangs too.
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kacpi_notify calls sleeping function from invalid context
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451399
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remov
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16536|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 13:33 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Created an attachment (id=16536)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16536&action=view)
> --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 13:24 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> Created an attachment (id=16536)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16536&action=view) [details]
> Debug patch #4
>
> Now, let's tr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16535|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 13:15 ---
Is there any chance to test 32-bit kernel? With this applied to 32-bit
kernel, we should be able to resume without touching stack at all.
(Doing it in 64-bit kernel is not so
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 13:12 ---
That was to check if it would trap on an attempt to write to a know location in
the data segment. It wouldn't, so it means DS is rather not loaded with a code
segment selector
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 11:09 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (In reply to comment #33)
>> Created an attachment (id=16535)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16535&action=view)
> --> (http://bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 10:44 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Created an attachment (id=16535)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16535&action=view) [details]
> Debug patch #3
>
> Kirill, pleas
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 08:57 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure what is going on here; one crazy explanation would be
> "%rsp has high bits set"...
Impossible, unless we're in *long* mode...
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 08:50 ---
1. We know that the value of DS is correct, so the value of SS should be
correct too, because it's the same value, and therefore our assumption that
we've been called at CS:0 i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16529|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 07:27 ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> *Grumble*
>
> My $LARGE_POLITICAL_ENTITY for an ICE for stuff like this.
>
> We need to get some info out. What do we have available?
1. We know
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10923
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 06:55 ---
I've tried upgrading the BIOS, but now the situation is even worse. I can't
resume from S3 anymore at all. The video driver is not initialized anymore
under 2.6.25.6.
2.6.26r
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 06:49 ---
The nomwait patch also works for me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10934
Summary: acpi -t showing sometimes insane values
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc6-git2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 04:43 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> What happens if you comment out the "pushl $0 ; popfl" along with the "calll
> main", without the debug patch #2?
It reboots on "pushw $0", line 8
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c48
--- Comment #48 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 03:39:18
MDT ---
I had to add "splash=off nosplash".
I did not use acpi_osi="!
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c47
Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c46
--- Comment #46 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 03:21:43
MDT ---
Using that kernel the system boots to the point where ist say
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c45
Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 01:33 ---
> Something that does come to mind is if it at all possible we're not actually
> in
> real mode when this code is entered?
Hmm, that would be bad and against the spec. Not s
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c44
--- Comment #44 from Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 02:26:20
MDT ---
> Well, I booted with acpi_osi="!Windows 2006" and now the pro
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c43
--- Comment #43 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 01:27:46
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222669)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c42
--- Comment #42 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 01:22:41
MDT ---
Well, I booted with acpi_osi="!Windows 2006" and now the prob
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c41
--- Comment #41 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 01:08:45
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222667)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396311#c40
--- Comment #40 from Sebastian Gerecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-18 01:07:11
MDT ---
Created an attachment (id=222666)
--> (https://bugzilla.nove
59 matches
Mail list logo
