http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 23:56 ---
The bug is that the event was wrongly disabled (why?) ... the ff_rt_clk file is
just showing evidence of that failure. The first 166 interrupts arrived just
fine, then somethin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11235
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11292
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 23:46 ---
can you manually move one interrupt to cpu1? like:
echo "2" > /proc/irq/14/smp_affinity
if you can see the interrupt increment in irq 14, then this isn't a bug.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 22:50 ---
That the /sys/firware/acpi/interrupts/ff_rt_clk becomes "invalid" won't affect
anything. It indicates that the ACPI_EVENT_RTC event is disabled. In fact "166
invalid" means that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11270
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 21:38 ---
I'm not following the comments here...
Re comment #3: the patch from bug 11153 sets up a handler which will take care
of all RTC IRQs, and leaves it registered at all times ...
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|1 |0
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL P
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 18:35 ---
as this is a regression,
could you please run git bisect to find out which commit introduces the problem
please?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.osdl.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 18:09 ---
IMO, this is the same bug introduced by
a1531acd43310a7e4571d52e8846640667f4c74b
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 14:36 ---
I just noticed that the *diagnostic* /sys/firmware/... file changed in RC1 to
include the "invalid" status (commit 71b58cbb0c30d1f78636a48c4721529449d6ea37),
which wasn't previo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #124 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 13:33 ---
i checked it and fedora hasn't still pulled the 20080321 patch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||11153
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
Summary: ACPI_EVENT_RTC handler gets spontaneously disabled
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.27-rc2-git (as of 11-aug-2008 evening)
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|N
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 10:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=17189)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17189&action=view)
grep . /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/*
If I run "echo 1 > /proc/acpi/vid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 07:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17188)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17188&action=view)
dmesg of 2.6.27-rc2-git5 kernel patched with ykzhao's two debug patches b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 07:44 ---
eeeh where I said "reebooting" I meant "waking up automatically after suspend"
:)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17187|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 07:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=17187)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17187&action=view)
dmesg after patch
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/user
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 07:34 ---
The patch doesn't change anything, the system continues rebooting
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11310
Summary: MSI VR 330 Laptop hard locks with 2.6.24 and upper
kernels
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Main
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 07:17 ---
> No, this is real overheat. Readings are very consistent, and values go
> to 95C range. Machine is hot, too, and fails to start after critical shutdown.
It looks like the trip
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regression|0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
Summary: THRM temperature reported as 3428C
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26.2-2.fc8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Fedora
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 05:50 ---
Thomas tried to debug this, here is my reply:
> Hmm, relatively obvious is the Warning after resume?
> Does this only happen after suspend?
No, it happens after fresh boot, to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #123 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 05:34 ---
I didn't know that, sorry. My kernel says: ACPI: Core revision 20070126 and it
is FC9 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686. Maybe the vanilla/fedora kernel team has
forgotten to apply the up
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11292
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 03:12 ---
> --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 02:53 ---
> Aug 6 11:00:10 amd kernel: Critical temperature reached (128 C),
> shutting down.
>
> This could be a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 02:55 ---
> even better acpi.debug_level=0x1F or 0x21F when the machine shuts down.
I mean additionally to acpidump. acpidump and dmesg is a must to start at all
looking at this.
--
Co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11281
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 02:25 ---
Hi, Gu Rui
Will you please try it again when the patch in comment #16 is not applied?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9399
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 01:29 ---
Thanks for reconsidering pushing the patch upstream.
As for the BIOS being buggy. Of course, I fully agree. The system way would be
to fix BIOS. However, I think the probabilit
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-12 00:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=17184)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17184&action=view)
dmesg of 2.6.27-rc2-git5 kernel patched with ykzhao's three debug patches
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7299
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
44 matches
Mail list logo