http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |acpi_power-sleep-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|power- |acpi_power-sleep-
|[
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11352
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 18:51 ---
Hi, Juan
Thanks for the info.
It seems that this issue is related with the BIOS. There is no
_PSS/_PCT/_PPC object in acpi table, which is required by acpi_cpufreq driver
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11093
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 17:47 ---
Thanks for your help and sorry for the delay. I'll compile 2.6.27-rc1 on the
next weekend.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Yo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11345
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 16:44 ---
Also, can you attach the output of 'dmesg' and the output of command
# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/state*/*
with CPU_IDLE enabled.
--
Configure bugmail: http:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 12:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=17313)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17313&action=view)
dmesg after the latest two patches
ok, this is the dmesg after those two
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11352
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 10:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=17308)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17308&action=view)
Output of cat /proc/cpuinfo
I attach the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11352
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 10:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=17307)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17307&action=view)
dmesg output with cpufreq.debug=7
I attach the dmesg output when booting
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11352
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 09:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=17306)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17306&action=view)
BIOS dump with acpidump
This is the BIOS dump with:
acpidump > biosdump.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|INSUFFICIE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 09:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=17305)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17305&action=view)
2.6.27-rc3, booted with nolapic_timer
i386: Problem is still exists with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11345
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 08:07 ---
Hi,
That is right. With CONFIG_CPU_IDLE enabled the sensors
temparature
is higher.
With maxcpus=1 the difference stil exists.
acpidump is attached.
Thanks.
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #67 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 05:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=17301)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17301&action=view)
./test 0xfed9 0x4000 result
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10839
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 03:12 ---
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10839
Hello,
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-17 19:27 ---
> so there are two problem here,
>1. syst
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 03:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=17300)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17300&action=view)
Get the info using ./test 0xfed9 0x4000 result
Will you please use t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11245
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|11167 |
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 02:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=17299)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17299&action=view)
/proc/interrupts with irqpoll (after 10 seconds)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 02:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=17298)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17298&action=view)
/proc/interrupts with irqpoll (first)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 02:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=17297)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17297&action=view)
proper lspci -vxxx
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/us
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 02:01 ---
Will you please try to add the boot option of "irqpoll" and attach the content
of "/proc/interrupts" twice?(The time interval is about 10s).
Please attach the output of "lspci
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6892
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 01:30 ---
My vote is still what I suggested in comment #2: just call resume(). Nobody
has come up with a reason why that would be inappropriate ...
Re: "I assume no device can enter su
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 00:34 ---
I'll try to reproduce it with 2.6.27-rc3 today (both x86 and x86_64 builds) and
let you know. Please let me know, if I should test another release or some git
tree.
--
Confi
27 matches
Mail list logo
