http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 00:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=17475)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17475action=view)
git bisect log
I finished the git bisecting, the result is:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 00:09 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Will you please confirm whether the LID event can be reported correctly
after suspend/resume cycle on the working kernel?
I tested kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 01:37 ---
Hi, Marton
Do you have an opportunity to try the debug patch in comment #4?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 03:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17478)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17478action=view)
dmesg after dsdt replacing
I have the same result as with native dsdt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 03:59 ---
For me it's very strange... I've read a lot of conferences dedicated to this
problem and a lot of victims wrote that i windows sleep and hibernate work
correctly. If windows
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 04:24 ---
Vista 64bit does suspend and restore also.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 05:32 ---
Hi, ykzhao
Thanks for your great effort. I agree with you. This bug can be marked as
RESOLVED. I opened an other bug entry:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11141
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 06:45 ---
Hi, Rafael
The patch in comment #11 is already included in 2.6.27-rc4.
Thanks for caring this issue.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 08:20 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Do you have an opportunity to try the debug patch in comment #4?
I applied the patch from comment #4 to Linux kernel 2.6.27-rc4. I am now
waiting
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 10:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=17482)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17482action=view)
dmesg
(In reply to comment #2)
Will you please try the attached debug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 10:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=17483)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17483action=view)
kernel .config
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16940|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16941|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16942|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 14:00 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/io_op# ./ior --addr 0x804 --width 16
the value of IO port 0x804 is 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/io_op# ./ior --addr 0x830 --width 16
the value of IO
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10811
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 17:31 ---
should I try to override SSDT as well? worth trying?
Thanks, not worth trying
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11345
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 17:50 ---
With the test patch kernel just hangs after
cpuidle: using governor menu
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
--- Comment #129 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 18:20 ---
Hi, Alwin
Thanks for the test.
It seems that the system still can't work as what we expected after
applying the patch in comment #125. And the GPI_ROUTING register in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 18:49 ---
Hi, Marton
Thanks for the confirm. It seems that the laptop still can't work as what
we expected after applying the patch in comment #4.(The warning message won't
affect
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17469|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 19:41 ---
Hi, Marton
Will you please confirm whether the AC event can be reported on the kernel
of 2.6.27-rc4?
From the acpidump info it seems that the event of LID AC BAT0 is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11421
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11421
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #92 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 20:33 ---
Hi, Daniele
Will you please confirm whether the system is affected by the following
message?
atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0xe0 on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #13 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 22:03 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
IMO, in order to fix this problem,
1) evaluating _CRT should fail, rather than return an arbitrary value in the
current ACPICA code.
2) thermal
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 22:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=17493)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17493action=view)
dmesg with patch from comment #12
(In reply to comment #12)
Will you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 22:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=17494)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17494action=view)
patch: introduce AE_STRICT
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 22:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=17495)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17495action=view)
patch: thermal driver check _CRT strictly
Bob,
when there is no return
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 22:56 ---
Hi, Marton
thanks for the confirmation. It seems that the event of AC can't be
reported correctly on 2.6.27-rc4. And the debug patch in comment #12 can't fix
the issue.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[regression] LID switch |[regression] LID switch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 22:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=17496)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17496action=view)
dmesg of 2.6.27-rc4+patch from comment #12 + DEBUG
I enabled the DEBUG
36 matches
Mail list logo
