http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #68 from peter.kl...@aon.at 2009-03-11 22:59 ---
2.6.29-rc7 (no patches applied):
r...@asus:~# grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/*
/sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/actual_brightness:0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12856
--- Comment #3 from uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-03-11 23:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=20497)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20497action=view)
xorg.conf
(In reply to comment #2)
First of all, I don't know if we
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12816
--- Comment #14 from m...@iworks.at 2009-03-12 01:02 ---
Sorry no, I don't think this bug is bug is resolved yet.
I'll need the weekend to cleanup an repatch my sony-laptop.c with the patchset
of linux-acpi@ and this little attachemnt.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12859
Summary: Special keys unusable after resume on battery - T21
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.29-rc7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12830
b...@mrvanes.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12037
--- Comment #28 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-12 01:40 ---
hi, the previous patch you tested is not for upstream kernel.
please follow the instructions in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249#c69
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12235
--- Comment #10 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-12 01:42 ---
hi, the previous patch you tested is not for upstream kernel.
please try this patch in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249#c69
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12830
--- Comment #11 from b...@mrvanes.com 2009-03-12 01:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=20501)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20501action=view)
dmesg of stuck scaling_max_freq in single user mode
This is a single user
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011
--- Comment #125 from uh.li...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 02:03 ---
Udelay (550)
Works for me for a week with several plug/unplug cycles without any errors
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011
--- Comment #126 from r0...@ukr.net 2009-03-12 02:09 ---
yes,
kernel from git and udelau(550) works over 4 days
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20479|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12859
lmc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10932
lmc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lmc...@gmail.com
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12269
--- Comment #20 from robin.bankh...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 02:18 ---
ÒK, will do. One more question: as I've had this issue with the whole 2.6.27
line, would it be better to do this with 2.6.27.0 ?
I'll also check if noapic alone does
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12856
r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@sisk.pl
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12856
--- Comment #5 from uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 08:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=20506)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20506action=view)
dmidecode output
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12856
--- Comment #6 from uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 08:26 ---
It seems to not occure with xorg-server 1.5. I'll check with 1.6. If it work it
means that a) it is a 'random' bug b) it is fixed in git. I'll check it soon
(or report that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12856
--- Comment #4 from uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 08:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=20505)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20505action=view)
Acpidump output
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12269
--- Comment #21 from robin.bankh...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 12:49 ---
To answer the other question, noapic on its own is enough to prevent the
problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #70 from peter.kl...@aon.at 2009-03-12 13:46 ---
2.6.29-rc7 (patch from comment #60 applied):
r...@asus:~# grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/*
/sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/actual_brightness:0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #71 from peter.kl...@aon.at 2009-03-12 14:57 ---
2.6.29-rc7 (patch from comment #69 applied):
Directory /sys/class/backlight is empty.
r...@asus:~# cat /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD/brightness
not supported
Backlight
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #53 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-12 15:53
---
I was able to test 2.6.29-rc6 with your patch overnight on the S7020. After
loading the video module (without fujitsu-laptop loaded and having not supplied
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12269
--- Comment #22 from robin.bankh...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 16:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=20509)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20509action=view)
dmesg from kernel 2.6.27
Here's the dmesg from original 2.6.27
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12269
--- Comment #23 from robin.bankh...@gmail.com 2009-03-12 16:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=20510)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20510action=view)
.config for 2.6.27 kernel
Here's the .config that produced the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #72 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-12 17:55 ---
Peter, please attach the dmesg output with the kernel in comment #71. thanks
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #18 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-12 18:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=20511)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20511action=view)
Change defaults for IBM thinkpads to brightness_mode=2
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #17 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-12 18:42 ---
Ok, code is ready to set all models to mode 2 (UCMS), but keep the ATI-based
T43 at mode 3 (UCMS + EC).
But reading this bug report, I can't seem to understand if mode 2 (UCMS)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12846
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #11
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12831
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12846
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|acpi- |
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
--- Comment #20 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-12 22:13 ---
*** Bug 11785 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11785
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
32 matches
Mail list logo