http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7907
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6779
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7958
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6262
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7147
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6751
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3800
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5962
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6259
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3203
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4542
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4205
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|7216|
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12881
shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_acpica-c...@kernel-|ming.m@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #26 from shaohua...@intel.com 2009-03-24 20:22 ---
how about not load i801_smbus driver? Since the _L15 method will use smbus,
which might conflict with smbus driver.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #20 from shaohua...@intel.com 2009-03-24 20:05 ---
Will you please try the following boot option?
a. acpi_sci=high
b. acpi_sci=edge
c. acpi_sci=edge acpi_sci=high
can you try the boot option as suggested in comm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
--- Comment #29 from shaohua...@intel.com 2009-03-24 19:48 ---
how about load the i915 drm driver?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #25 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-24 19:44 ---
Will you please do the test as required in comment #19 and then see whether the
kacpid can work well?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #19 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-24 19:12 ---
Hi, Kenney
From the log in comment #18 it seems that the issue also exists on the
2.6.26 kernel. Can the hotkey work after the ACPI IRQ 9 is disabled?
Will you plea
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #33 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:30 ---
Congrats, Pascal. :)
Now you just need to try kernel 2.6.29.
you can get the source code tarball linux-2.6.29.tar.bz2 at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rui.zh...@intel.com |a...@osdl.org
Status|NEE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #59 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:31 ---
okay, 2.6.29 would be a good candidate.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|acpi- |rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12197
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|venkatesh.pallip...@intel.co|rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #80 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:25 ---
Denys, it looks like a duplicate of bug #12731, doesn't it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #21 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:19 ---
yes, please. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
h...@hmh.eng.br changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.27 |2.6.12 and all later kernels
--
Conf
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #11 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 18:06 ---
There you have the partial fix patches.
We still need a much proper connection between power management and ACPI power
resources... enable power resources when devices are ena
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #10 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 18:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=20663)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20663&action=view)
Revert band-aid commit
When power resources are properly attached, the PUB
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #9 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 18:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=20662)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20662&action=view)
Attach power resources for already-enabled PCI devices
Careful. After this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
h...@hmh.eng.br changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20511|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-proces...@kernel-|rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
--- Comment #22 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-24 17:48 ---
Hi, Aljaz
The test results seems weird. Before the custom DSDT is used, the box can
be resumed from S3(in comment #15). But after using the custom DSDT, the box
can't be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #21 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 17:35 ---
Please test the latest thinkpad-acpi beta version, available at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=117042&package_id=230205
And tell me if it fixes your bri
Thanks. It seems that requires a kernel recompile, I will look on that
soon when I have more time.
Never mind the talk about /etc/acpi, I rechecked and it seems the
problem is present no matter what script is used to suspend.
--
Lid state is incorrect (closed) after resume with lid open
https://
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
--- Comment #21 from prus...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 14:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=20661)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20661&action=view)
before message with custom dsdt
Now it's even weirder. I compiled now the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|INSUFFICI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
--- Comment #28 from gmai...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 13:08 ---
Thanks for still trying to solve this :)
I tried patch and command line argument from comment #27 with released 2.6.29
kernel and got exactly same result as before - it did no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.15.4|2.6.29rc5
--
Configure bugma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
astarikovs...@suse.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19561|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
astarikovs...@suse.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19562|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #2 from jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 02:30 ---
No :(:
$ dmesg|grep -i acpi.debug
$
I don't know how to reproduce it, my feeling is that it usually happens after
few days of being turned off (in S4).
--
Configure bugmail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #20 from eddy.petrisor+lin...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 01:59
---
2.6.29 was just released. Is OK if I try that kernel with your patch?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
49 matches
Mail list logo