http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #35 from Eddy Petrișor 2009-04-16
06:43:04 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > There is a last patch in bug #12011, could you try it?
>
> I tried the patch over the 2.6.29 kernel and I got the same resul
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #34 from Eddy Petrișor 2009-04-16
06:40:25 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> There is a last patch in bug #12011, could you try it?
I tried the patch over the 2.6.29 kernel and I got the same result. I made sure
ec_intr wasn't pres
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13091
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #2 from ykzh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan...@ffwll.ch
--- Comment #17 from Zhang
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #16 from ykzhao 2009-04-16 03:21:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=21005)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21005)
[debug patch]: delete the conversion between idle time and sleep ticks in idle
thread
will you plea
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13094
--- Comment #2 from alexs 2009-04-16 01:36:09 ---
it is duplicated with bug 13087, but I did not found some ways set this as
previous bugzilla. :(
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #15 from ykzhao 2009-04-16 02:22:54 ---
Hi, Bruno
Will you please try the boot option of "clocksource=acpi_pm" and see
whether the box still hangs?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?ta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjg59-ker...@srcf.ucam.org,
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13094
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-proces...@kernel |yakui.z...@intel.com
|-bugs.os
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13094
--- Comment #3 from ykzhao 2009-04-16 02:17:10 ---
Hi, Alex
What you said is right. It is the duplicate bug of 13087.
Will you please try the boot option of "clocksource=acpi_pm" and see
whether the box still hangs?
Thanks.
--
C
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #14 from john stultz 2009-04-16 02:16:09 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hi, Bruno
> sorry for the incorrect parameters in comment #3. The boot option should
> be
> "processor.max_cstate=1" or "idle=poll". When the boot option
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #13 from ykzhao 2009-04-16 02:09:03 ---
Hi, Bruno
sorry for the incorrect parameters in comment #3. The boot option should be
"processor.max_cstate=1" or "idle=poll". When the boot option of
"processor.max_cstate=0" is added, t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13091
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rui.zh...@intel.com |acpi-bugzi...@lists.sourcef
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13091
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13094
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Morton 2009-04-15
21:47:27 ---
2.6.29-rc2 is a funny kernel version to be testing: -rc2 is always full
of regressions.
Is the bug also present in 2.6.29 final?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kerne
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095
Summary: thinkpad-acpi: cannot control brightness with hotkeys
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Stat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13094
Summary: Thinkpad X40 randomly hangs while booting.
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29-rc2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12170
--- Comment #34 from Francisco Pina Martins
2009-04-15 21:03:06 ---
It is indeed strange.
But it might in fact be the difference.
Maybe someone else with a Compal IFL90 could give some feedback too.
In the meantime I tried out the "stress" pr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13091
Matteo Drera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seven.iss...@gmail.com
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13091
Summary: No ac_adapter ACAD events on AC plug-in on HP dv6xxx
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #12 from Bruno 2009-04-15 19:32:12 ---
Disabling async boot produces no change (forcing enable_async in kernel/async.c
to 0).
So I don't know what makes the printk in acpi_idle_enter_simple() prevent
hang...
--
Configure bugmail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #11 from Bruno 2009-04-15 18:05:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=20997)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20997)
log with printk - in _c1 [in _c1 only = hang, erverywhere=boot]
Follow-up to comment #10 (log extrac
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #10 from Bruno 2009-04-15 17:35:51 ---
In reply to comment #6
Adding printk() right after each assignment of kt1 and kt2, showing their
respecitive value the kernel does not stall...
I will try moving around the printk's hopefull
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #9 from Bruno 2009-04-15 16:53:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=20995)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20995)
notsc hangs too
In reply to comment #4
Booting with notsc also causes the kernel to hang and there i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
--- Comment #8 from Bruno 2009-04-15 16:46:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=20994)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20994)
processor.max_cstate=0 panic
In reply to comment #3
Booting with processor.max_cstate=0 causes the p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #33 from Dennis Jansen 2009-04-15 16:30:36
---
to 23 from all the testing... hope this one won't break like my last one a
month ago.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #32 from Dennis Jansen 2009-04-15 16:29:36
---
Fix confirmed.
2.6.30-rc1 did not fix the problem, rather it appeared without the fastboot
parameter as well. But 2.6.30-rc2 is fixed with or without fastboot parameter.
Nice Work!
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13065
--- Comment #6 from Rafael Varela Pet 2009-04-15
15:45:34 ---
Before pressing the mute key:
/sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/error:0
/sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/ff_gbl_lock:0
/sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/ff_pmtimer:0
/sys/firmware/acpi/inter
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13087
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from ykzhao 2009-04
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12376
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liontos.aristote...@gmail.c
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13089
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_b...@kernel-bugs.osdl. |yakui.z...@intel.com
|org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13089
--- Comment #3 from ykzhao 2009-04-15 13:01:00 ---
Will you please try the patch in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12376#C45 ?
In fact the above message is correct. It reports the potential risk.
The ECIO(0xcc00-cc1f) is defined
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13089
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #2 from ykzh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13089
--- Comment #1 from Liontos Aristotelis
2009-04-15 11:50:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=20989)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20989)
dmesg lspci acpidump ioports
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13089
Summary: ACPI: I/O resource ... conflicts with ACPI region ...
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
--- Comment #17 from Maciej Piechotka 2009-04-15
11:46:29 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Well, if XP behaves no better, we probably didn't grow a new bug, but still
> please do test older kernel.org releases (that's what I called 'mainline')
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
--- Comment #16 from Henrique de Moraes Holschuh 2009-04-15
11:25:05 ---
Well, if XP behaves no better, we probably didn't grow a new bug, but still
please do test older kernel.org releases (that's what I called 'mainline') to
give us a sure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
--- Comment #15 from Maciej Piechotka 2009-04-15
10:07:08 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Maciej, can you tell us of a _mainline_ (aka Linus) kernel that behaved better
> on your thinkpad than 2.6.29.1 does?
By mainline you mean version from
38 matches
Mail list logo