https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14216
--- Comment #28 from Marek Lotke 2010-03-25 06:58:16 ---
it still didn't work. But I get this in dmesg now:
bio: create slab at 0
ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored
BBB
ACPI: Interpr
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15528
--- Comment #22 from Kyle 2010-03-25 06:50:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=25703)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25703)
grep -i acpi /var/log/messages
the whole syslog file is too large to attach here. this is all refe
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15528
--- Comment #21 from Kyle 2010-03-25 06:47:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=25702)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25702)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15528
--- Comment #20 from Kyle 2010-03-25 06:46:48 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Created an attachment (id=25700)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25700) [details]
> patch: evaluate EC _REG explicitly
>
> could you please try
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14576
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
AssignedTo|acpi_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15164
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15164
--- Comment #7 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 06:18:50 ---
ping carlos
and Michal,
please verify the problem still exists in the latest upstream kernel, :p.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15182
--- Comment #27 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 06:15:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=25701)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25701)
tool to get intput event
please download the read-input-event.c attached.
and do the following
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15182
--- Comment #26 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 06:11:28 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> then you can use the acpi_genl tool at
> http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/utilities.php
This doesn't work for ACPI video hotkeys, please ignore this com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15182
--- Comment #25 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 06:10:44 ---
then you can use the acpi_genl tool at
http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/utilities.php
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15528
--- Comment #19 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 06:00:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=25700)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25700)
patch: evaluate EC _REG explicitly
could you please try this patch?
--
Configure bugmail: ht
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15594
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Power-Off |Other
AssignedTo|rui.zh...@intel.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15594
--- Comment #8 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 05:44:05 ---
as this is a 2.6.34-rc1 regression, it would be great if you can use git bisect
to find out which commit introduces this bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15627
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15627
--- Comment #1 from 00oo00 2010-03-25 05:05:10 ---
And my boot dmesg is here.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41834425/boot.messages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15627
Summary: ACPI brightness bug no FN F7 F8 brightness control, no
keycode of 4 keys and start up with a dim brightness
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.31.20
Platform: A
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #27 from Robert Moore 2010-03-25 04:16:26
---
Well, this is a really old version of ACPICA, we've made literally hundreds of
changes since then.
But the commit to our git tree is
ffd0eca830ee3f762e387fe5519fe34fc44b0231
at http
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #26 from D. Hugh Redelmeier 2010-03-25 03:29:02
---
dmesg shows this:
ACPI: Core revision 20060707
In include/acpi/acconfig.h:
#define ACPI_CA_VERSION 0x20060707
So this version seems to be two weeks too old
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #35 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 03:03:56 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > values 14 and higher seems to cause strange behavior ... they produce so
> > much
> > debug info,
>
> please boot with acpi.deb
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #34 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 02:55:55 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> values 14 and higher seems to cause strange behavior ... they produce so much
> debug info,
please boot with acpi.debug_layer=0x80 acpi.debug_level=0x2002 thi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #25 from Robert Moore 2010-03-25 02:14:04
---
In older versions, ACPI_CA_VERSION is in include/acpi/acconfig.h
in either case, it looks like this:
/* Current ACPICA subsystem version in MMDD format */
#define ACPI_CA_VERSI
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #24 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 02:10:05 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I don't really know how to tell which version of ACPI CA is included in the
> CentOS 5.4 kernel (i.e. the RHEL 5.4 kernel). Any suggestions?
>
check ACPI_CA_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14216
--- Comment #27 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-25 02:04:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=25693)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25693)
patch: evaluate EC _REG explicitly
please try this patch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugz
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
--- Comment #17 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-03-25 01:44:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=25692)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25692)
2.6.34-0.17.1.rc2.git1.fc14.x86_64 + attachment 25691 log
Works ok so far.
--
Configure b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15344
--- Comment #29 from bugzillakernel...@lez.ath.cx 2010-03-25 01:42:49 ---
thanks for the suggestion, i tried that to no avail; i'm on freenode and can be
contacted at this email address if anyone wants to help troubleshoot; i can't
rule out my
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #23 from D. Hugh Redelmeier 2010-03-25 00:14:05
---
I don't really know how to tell which version of ACPI CA is included in the
CentOS 5.4 kernel (i.e. the RHEL 5.4 kernel). Any suggestions?
The kernel.org version that it is ba
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14679
--- Comment #76 from Steve Rigler 2010-03-24 23:37:04 ---
I applied the patch to 2.6.33.1 and can boot cleanly with "acpi=copy_dsdt" on
my A505. FYI, I get this trace unless I boot with "nohpet" on any kernel, but
maybe it's unrelated:
Call
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Bjorn Helgaas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25460|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
--- Comment #15 from Bjorn Helgaas 2010-03-24 22:06:09
---
Created an attachment (id=25690)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25690)
Windows GA-MA78GM-S2H PCI bus resources
>From the DSDT in comment 13, we can see that the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #22 from Robert Moore 2010-03-24 21:10:49
---
I guess I should ask what version of ACPICA you are using. This issue was
resolved nearly four years ago:
21 July 2006. Summary of changes for version 20060721:
1) ACPI CA Core Subs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #21 from D. Hugh Redelmeier 2010-03-24 21:04:46
---
Summary: it currently looks to me as if this bug is not in the current tree!
Sorry for wasting your time!
Details:
I've tracked down the code from #17 to here:
patchwork.kern
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #33 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 17:22:09 ---
values 14 and higher seems to cause strange behavior ... they produce so much
debug info, that it doesn't fit into the 126kB dmesg window and the diff fails
...
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14216
--- Comment #26 from Marek Lotke 2010-03-24 17:20:20 ---
no change after acpi_osi="!Windows 2009", sorry
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #32 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 17:18:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=25688)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25688)
dmesg diffs
I created the following script to cut the acpi debug parts associated with eac
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14101
Len Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Power-Processor |Platform-Drivers
AssignedTo|yakui.z.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #20 from Robert Moore 2010-03-24 15:59:53
---
By dynamic, I do in fact mean that the BIOS changes the size of the package
during initialization.
The object returned from acpi_evaluate_object ("_PSS") in this case should be
an AC
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #19 from D. Hugh Redelmeier 2010-03-24 15:53:49
---
As I mentioned earlier, I found that some Powernow-k8 code did similar sanity
checks on the values. If we can be convinced that all these checks are
downstream of the code we a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #18 from D. Hugh Redelmeier 2010-03-24 15:47:20
---
If I understand Robert's statement, it would seem that this whole problem could
be eliminated by using the correct item count. That sure would be cleaner and
simpler than filte
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
Robert Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert.mo...@intel.com
--- Comment #17
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
Jaromír Cápík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25682|0 |1
is obsolete|
** Attachment added: "Current bootchart on unpatched lucid beta 1, upgraded
from karmic."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41836679/rock-laptop-lucid-20100323-7.png
--
18 seconds ACPI delay while booting due to DSDT
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100110
You received this bug notification becau
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #30 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 13:45:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=25682)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25682)
dmesg of the acpi debug
I used the following script to collect the particular dmesg output
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #29 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 10:59:11 ---
Btw. I have tried to collect the dmesg output, but there's too much info and
the output is always cut to 126kB + something.
Should I create more dmesg outputs for the particular "echo
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #28 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 10:53:43 ---
yes ... if i set the minimum brightness in GRUB, then it stays at the low level
on both computers ...
the only difference is in initial /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
va
Need more informations ? Bootchart on Lucid ?
Thx
--
18 seconds ACPI delay while booting due to DSDT
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100110
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
--- Comment #14 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-03-24 09:14:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=25679)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25679)
2.6.34-0.17.rc2.git1.fc14.x86_64 + workaround + att. 25523 debug
--
Configure bugmail: ht
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #27 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-24 09:11:44 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Ok ... I will do that during lunch break ...
>
> One note ... I found a quite logical difference in behavior between HP Mini
> 5102 and my second Lenovo R61
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #26 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 09:07:31 ---
but ... the behavior mentioned in my previous comment applies on kernels 2.6.32
and higher only
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
--- Comment #25 from Jaromír Cápík 2010-03-24 09:00:04 ---
Ok ... I will do that during lunch break ...
One note ... I found a quite logical difference in behavior between HP Mini
5102 and my second Lenovo R61 laptop where the brightness wo
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|powernow-k8: _PSS sanity|_PSS sanity check prevents
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15532
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-bugzi...@lists.sourcef
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
--- Comment #13 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-03-24 07:40:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=25674)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25674)
GA-MA78GM-S2H rev 1.0 F11 - DSDT
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
--- Comment #12 from Yanko Kaneti 2010-03-24 07:39:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=25673)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25673)
GA-MA78GM-S2H rev 1.0 F11 - acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/use
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14216
--- Comment #25 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-24 07:34:20 ---
what if you boot with acpi_osi="!Windows 2009"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15594
--- Comment #7 from blackdream 2010-03-24 07:32:53
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > /sbin/halt "${opts}"
> >
> what if you comment this line?
It doesn't work.
http://picasaweb.google.com/blackdream1890/Kernel2634Rc2#5452098710986501506
U
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15054
--- Comment #32 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-24 07:25:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=25672)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25672)
code to get input event
please first attach the output of "grep . /sys/class/input/input*/*".
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15054
--- Comment #31 from Zhang Rui 2010-03-24 07:19:21 ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Well, if they don't do anything either I should, right?
Sorry, I misread your comment.
please open a new bug report for the other hotkey issues.
I'm not sure
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
--- Comment #16 from D. Hugh Redelmeier 2010-03-24 07:11:54
---
[This response is a bit rambling. Sorry.]
You say "it is reasonable that _PSS may ... end with some invalid entries".
Why do you think that is reasonable? It seems like a BI
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14216
--- Comment #24 from Marek Lotke 2010-03-24 07:03:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=25671)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25671)
lspci & acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
59 matches
Mail list logo
