https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #106 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Created attachment 306970
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306970&action=edit
v6.10.12 with debug prints (successful connection and disconnection)
Sometimes, random
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #306968|0 |1
is obsole
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #104 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
No, this order is core code in ucsi_handle_connector_change(), where you can
see that the first thing that happens is GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS. Could you try
just printing out *val rat
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #103 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
And could this be the issue? That the order of the calls is wrong and then the
module is processing the previous command? Because I don't see any issues in
the systemtap script. If I i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #102 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
Yes, I am sure.
The first command that should be printed is a GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS, that ends
with 0x12 (in the case of that port 0x20012 and in case of using the other port
0x100
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #101 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Are you sure? I'm printing:
- val at line 61 (return)
- ua->cmd at line 72 (return)
- cci at line 213 (after the conditional return)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #100 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
Unfortunately it's still printing the previous command.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #306963|0 |1
is obsole
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #98 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Oh, I see. It should be statement 61, not 59 in my script above. Let me try
again.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watch
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #97 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
The debug statements need to be in those exact positions
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #96 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
Created attachment 306967
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306967&action=edit
debug_6.10
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #93 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
The log ends when I killed the script producing them after a few seconds, but
yes, the prints keep going.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #95 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
Hmm, does systemtap allow you to specify where in the function you want the
prints to happen? The logs you sent me are not printing the command correctly
because the print is happen
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #94 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Created attachment 306966
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306966&action=edit
systemtap script for debug prints
For your reference, this is the script I used to gene
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #92 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) ---
Thanks, the prints should be enough. I did not know about systemtap, would have
saved me some time as well :)
And just to confirm, do the prints keep being emitted for as long as t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #91 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Created attachment 306964
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306964&action=edit
v6.10.12 function calls
I did the same "exercise" as above, but in this case, I instruc
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076
--- Comment #90 from Iñaki Ucar (iu...@fedoraproject.org) ---
Created attachment 306963
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306963&action=edit
v6.10.12 with debug prints
If you just need these prints, I think it's easier if I plug
17 matches
Mail list logo
