http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.osdl.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 08:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=15570)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15570&action=view)
dmesg with Thomas' patch
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 08:50 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created an attachment (id=15476)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15476&action=view) [details]
> git commit c8d16e27a3601d1cbcdfe6
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-01 14:48 ---
Does Windows return the correct battery information for this machine? This
information would be very useful, as we are still trying to understand the
Windows behavior in these
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-31 10:01 ---
The reason there is no compilation error for the Z00x objects is that the
disassembler is automatically generating external statements for the missing
objects:
DefinitionBloc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-31 05:09 ---
In fact, this is not a BIOS, but only a kernel bug.
With recent acpica compiler there also is no warning for the Z00x usage (did
you see an error/warning here?):
iasl -sa dsdt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-30 19:13 ---
Hi, Lin
Thanks for the work. As you point in comment #9, the bug is caused by
broken BIOS.
Will you please try the patch in comment #12 and see whether the oops
messag
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 03:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=15477)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15477&action=view)
acpidump result
seems that Z003,Z004,Z005 only referenced in _BIF Method
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15462|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 03:23 ---
One sec..., I think this is fixed in 2.6.25-rc6.
I dig out the patches for testing, this should go to 2.6.24.X also after some
testing time?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 02:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=15474)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15474&action=view)
DSDT fix
This seems to be a BIOS bug (several hole in external reference)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 18:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=15471)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15471&action=view)
oops dmesg with initcall_debug parameter set
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15460|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15459|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 10:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=15462)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15462&action=view)
Do not use netlink in battery, but print out values that would be used
Do
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 09:45 ---
Please don't post these things compressed, I just want to click on the link and
look at them.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 09:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=15461)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15461&action=view)
kernel config
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpref
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 08:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=15460)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15460&action=view)
BIOS DSDT
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 08:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=15459)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15459&action=view)
oops dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.c
21 matches
Mail list logo
