http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Shaohua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #41 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-08-04
16:35:37 ---
Hello,
I am currently running 2.6.30.1 without any modifications, and the
uptime is about 30 days, during which I haven't seen a nobody cared
message.
I still don't know the cause
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #40 from ykzhao 2009-07-06 02:01:02 ---
>From the log in comment #38 it seems that this issue can't be reproduced on the
upstream kernel.
How about close this bug?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Shaohua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua...@intel.com
Regression|---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #38 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-05-11
15:01:21 ---
Hello,
Unfortunately, I have bad news. I had to restart my computer
a few times after an uptime of 6 or 7 days because of X crashes
which are unrelated to this bug.
After those re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #37 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-08
15:25:37 ---
The patch I attached a few seconds ago also changes the spurious
interrupt threshold to 10. However, the kernel I am currently using
has a threshold of 99, not 10.
As I said above,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #36 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-08
15:24:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=20888)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20888)
The patch that makes the kernel print out the name of the handler which
"worked" for the s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #35 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-08
15:22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=20887)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20887)
Output of lsusb -v
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #34 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-08
15:21:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=20886)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20886)
Output of lspci -vxxx
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #33 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-08
15:19:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=20885)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20885)
dmesg output for 2.6.29.1 with 99 as the spurious interrupt threshold
--
Configure bugma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #32 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-08
15:16:51 ---
Hello,
I will attach the output of "dmesg", "lspci -vxxx" and "lsusb -v" in a moment.
I am using Sidux, and the lsusb I have on my system does not have a "-l"
option. So, instead
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #31 from ykzhao 2009-04-08 08:00:25 ---
Hi
Sorry for the late response.
Will you please attach the output of dmesg, lspci -vxxx, lsusb -l?
From the test result it seems that the issue can be reproduced if the
spurious
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #30 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-04-04
13:12:53 ---
Hello,
Unfortunately, I have bad news. I took vanilla 2.6.29 and modified it so
that its spurious interrupt threshold is 99. After an uptime of 4 days
and 4.5 hours with this kerne
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #29 from ykz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #28 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-03-30
01:31:13 ---
Hello,
I apologize for not responding earlier; I wanted to gather more data before
posting a message.
I took 2.6.24's source and reduced its spurious interrupt limit to 10
in "ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #27 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 02:12 ---
ping Vefa.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #26 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-04 21:48 ---
HI, Vefa
How about the git-bisect result?
From the comment #25 it seems that there is no such issue on the 2.6.24
Debian's kernel. But the problem exists on the van
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #25 from bic...@superonline.com 2009-02-14 17:59 ---
Hello,
While bisecting (between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25), I noticed that the commits
between the so called good and bad commits were very unrelated to the
problem I am having.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
bic...@superonline.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19165|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #23 from bic...@superonline.com 2009-01-01 23:26 ---
Dear Zhang Rui,
I have started to bisect again, but this time with a 3-day waiting
period before declaring a kernel "good". I am currently on the 4th
iteration. However,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #22 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-28 17:57 ---
hi, vefa,
thanks for your effort, is that any test result?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #21 from bic...@superonline.com 2008-12-21 23:33 ---
Hello,
Wondering which commit could be the cause of this problem, I ran
"git bisect visualize". After noticing that nothing really relevant
showed up in the list of commi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-05 18:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=19165)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19165&action=view)
The output of "git bisect log"
Please note that the bisection is not com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-05 18:20 ---
Dear ykzhao,
I have confirmed that this problem exists in 2.6.25.19, 2.6.26.7
and 2.6.27.{1,2,4}.
I tried to blacklist all USB related modules on 2.6.27.x and have
confirmed
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 23:10 ---
Will you please double check whether the following issue still exists on the
kernel of 2.6.27.2?
>irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
If exists
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 23:03 ---
Hi, Pmarek
From the log it seems that the issue on your box is different with that on
Toshiba Satellite A100.
Will you please open a new bug and attach the output of ac
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 19:08 ---
So do any alsa guys look at the issue?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 10:47 ---
Update: Now STR doesn't work anymore, and I get more reports.
PM: Some devices failed to suspend
Restarting tasks ... done.
PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
Freezing user spa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 16:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=18856)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18856&action=view)
dmesg from Debian's 2.6.24 based kernel
Please note two things:
1) This
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #12 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 15:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=18835)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18835&action=view)
Contents of /proc/interrupts on Debian's 2.6.24-based kernel
--
Config
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 15:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=18834)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18834&action=view)
Output of "lspci -vv -xxx -nn"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.k
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 15:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=18833)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18833&action=view)
acpidump output
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.osdl.or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Component|Power-Proc
37 matches
Mail list logo
