http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #57 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-15 23:56
---
Ok, no worries.
Actually now you mention it, I knew the S7020 didn't have the ACPI video
extension support - it was pointed out to me quite some time ago which
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #56 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-15 22:28 ---
hah, this is a laptop without ACPI video extension support.
I'd say loading ACPI video driver or not has no impact to this laptop.
so, Andeghost,
it would be great if you ca
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #55 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-15 20:28
---
Created an attachment (id=20537)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20537&action=view)
acpidump from Fujitsu S7020 laptop
Here is the acpdidump
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #54 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-15 19:45 ---
Jonathan,
please attach the acpidump output of your S7020.
please attach the dmesg output with my patch applied.
I want to see if the ACPI video extension is available on thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #53 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-12 15:53
---
I was able to test 2.6.29-rc6 with your patch overnight on the S7020. After
loading the video module (without fujitsu-laptop loaded and having not supplied
"acp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #52 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-11 19:40 ---
that's okay,
please show me the result of "grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/*" both w/ and w/o
acpi_backlight=vendor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #51 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-11 19:08
---
I don't think I can reproduce the problems that andeghost sees. However, I
will test the resulting patch to ensure it doesn't break the S7020 and to see
what th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #50 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-11 18:21 ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> I shall test the patch on my S7020 tonight and get back to you. Which kernel
> is the patch against?
>
2.6.29-rc6
> I'm not sure I understand w
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #49 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-11 15:22
---
I shall test the patch on my S7020 tonight and get back to you. Which kernel
is the patch against?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the last sentence
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #48 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-11 00:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=20488)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20488&action=view)
patch: video cleanup
This is the patch I made for upstream.
it would b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #47 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-02 17:31 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> I'm so sorry that I didn't replay to you for a long time, I've pathed your
> path
> with 2.6.28.4 kernel last month, but I couldn't compile the k
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #46 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-03-02 14:48
---
Zhang: where to from here? There's probably not much more we can do without
further testing. In any case, is this more an acpi-video issue rather than
fujitsu-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #45 from shell...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 22:40 ---
I'm so sorry that I didn't replay to you for a long time, I've pathed your path
with 2.6.28.4 kernel last month, but I couldn't compile the kernel
successfully.
I've given up
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #44 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-25 17:48 ---
ping andeghost again. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC li
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #43 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-09 23:08 ---
ping andeghost. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #42 from shell...@gmail.com 2009-01-15 12:45 ---
I just installed gnome-power-manager, the backlight hotkeys can work now, but I
still have to press the keys many many times(the screen just blink) to get them
work.
I will tr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #41 from shell...@gmail.com 2009-01-14 21:24 ---
This is the debug message of dmesg, I successfully boot my system with
debug=0x:
debian:~# dmesg | grep FUJ02B1
[4.746841] input: Fujitsu FUJ02B1 as /class/input/input
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19755|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #40 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-01-11 18:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=19756)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19756&action=view)
patch-video-cleanup-1
please try this patch.
the ACPI video backlight
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #39 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-01-11 18:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=19755)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19755&action=view)
patch-video-cleanup-1
please try this patch.
the ACPI
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #38 from shell...@gmail.com 2009-01-04 21:25 ---
I've used the modprobe and echo ways to load the module as you say, but they
do not work...
When I reboot the system, the value of debug is reset to 3 again, I think
maybe I s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #37 from no...@gmx.net 2009-01-02 04:17 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> (In reply to comment #35)
> > (In reply to comment #34)
> > > Created an attachment (id=19514)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19514&
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #36 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-29 21:30 ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> (In reply to comment #34)
> > Created an attachment (id=19514)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19514&action=view) [details]
[de
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #35 from no...@gmx.net 2008-12-29 02:22 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Created an attachment (id=19514)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19514&action=view) [details]
> output of dmesg
hmmm ... strange can
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #34 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-28 22:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=19514)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19514&action=view)
output of dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/user
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #33 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-28 17:45 ---
please attach the dmesg output after the test in comment #31
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #32 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-24 09:20 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> can you compile the fujitsu-laptop module with debug
> (CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEBUG) and load it with debug=0x
> and check whats happening in d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #31 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-24 08:38 ---
I recompiled the 2.6.28-rc9 kernel with "CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEBUG=y" in
.config file, then use "echo 0x >
/sys/module/fujitsu_laptop/parameters/debug", with gnome runni
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #30 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-23 09:45 ---
I just found an amazing thing that when I press Fn+F5, the screen blinked and
if I press the keys many times, the brightness turned lower!!!
But in fact the Fn+F5 is not defin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #29 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-23 09:39 ---
> > I'll try to do this tonight, but I never compile a module alone or compile
> > it
> > with debug or load it with debug before, so maye it will cost me a few
> > days. :)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #28 from no...@gmx.net 2008-12-23 03:10 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Sometime when I was doing nothing, the screen would change the brightness
> itself, mostly change from the highest or lowest level to the middle.
Had
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #27 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 21:11 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> can you compile the fujitsu-laptop module with debug
> (CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEBUG) and load it with debug=0x
> and check whats happening in d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #26 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 21:05 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> kill acpid and run "cat /proc/acpi/event"
> is there an event every time you press the hotkey?
> please attach the output as well
>
this is the ou
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #25 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-22 17:08 ---
kill acpid and run "cat /proc/acpi/event"
is there an event every time you press the hotkey?
please attach the output as well
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #24 from no...@gmx.net 2008-12-22 07:35 ---
can you compile the fujitsu-laptop module with debug
(CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEBUG) and load it with debug=0x
and check whats happening in detail (with and without gnome running
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #23 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 04:33 ---
It seems that there are only 4 backlight levels if you control the backlight
throught hotkeys, althought there are 8 levels in
"/sys/devices/platform/fujitsu-laptop/lcd_level"
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #22 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 04:13 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I boot 2.6.28-rc9 kernel with acpi_backlight=vendor, and the hotkeys can work,
> but I found that if the brightness is at the highest or lowest lev
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #21 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-21 23:41 ---
I boot 2.6.28-rc9 kernel with acpi_backlight=vendor, and the hotkeys can work,
but I found that if the brightness is at the highest or lowest level, nomatter
how many times I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #20 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-21 21:46
---
If a BIOS upgrade is available for your laptop it is probably still worth
doing.
BTW I cannot immediately think of a reason why you must press the hotkeys man
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #19 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-21 21:22 ---
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > Hi all! I've compiled 2.6.28-rc9 kernel on my laptop(debian-lenny), but the
> > problem still exists and almost the same. I'll get the 1.28 ver
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #18 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-21 18:27 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> when the fujitsu-laptop module was not installed, the
> hotkeys does not work at all. When the fujitsu-laptop module w
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #17 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-20 02:49 ---
Hi all! I've compiled 2.6.28-rc9 kernel on my laptop(debian-lenny), but the
problem still exists and almost the same. I'll get the 1.28 version of BIOS at
Dec 22, then I'll tr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #16 from no...@gmx.net 2008-12-19 01:25 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> First of all, it seems we can not control the backlight via ACPI video unless
> there is a BIOS fixup.
Yes it seems that the BQC etc methods required f
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #15 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-18 21:39
---
I still think it's worth trying a 2.6.28-rc kernel at this point, so proceed
with your plans as outlined above and report back.
I should note that for the next
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #14 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 21:22 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> 1. Good point - we need to see what effect a BIOS upgrade has.
> 2. That's a very good question. From what little information I've seen on the
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #13 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-18 18:33
---
1. Good point - we need to see what effect a BIOS upgrade has.
2. That's a very good question. From what little information I've seen on the
subject it seems t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #12 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-18 17:50 ---
First of all, it seems we can not control the backlight via ACPI video unless
there is a BIOS fixup.
Second, the fujitsu driver can not catch the hotkey events, can it?
If i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #11 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-18 14:28
---
Since 2.6.26 is the latest kernel the reporter has tried it would be well worth
trying 2.6.28 when it is released (or even one of the more recent -rc
releases).
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #10 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 08:39 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hi, Andeghost
> Thanks for the info.
> From the description it seems that there exists two issues:
> a. Hotkey can't work well
> b.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #8 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2008-12-18 00:48 ---
Hi, Andeghost
Thanks for the info.
From the description it seems that there exists two issues:
a. Hotkey can't work well
b. the following warning messages:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #7 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-17 08:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=19344)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19344&action=view)
the output of my acpidump --addr 0x7F6655C3 --length 0x893 > acpidump.out
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #6 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-17 08:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> can you also attach the output of
> acpidump --addr 0x7F6655C3 --length 0x893
>
> (VIST table should contain BQC etc)
>
> can you change the backli
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #5 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-17 08:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=19343)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19343&action=view)
the output of my acpidump > acpidump.log
this the the output of my acpid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #4 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-17 08:22 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Will you please use the latest pmtool to attach the output of acpidump?
> The latest pmtool can be found in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #3 from no...@gmx.net 2008-12-17 08:13 ---
can you also attach the output of
acpidump --addr 0x7F6655C3 --length 0x893
(VIST table should contain BQC etc)
can you change the backlight using the platform interface in
/sys/d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_b...@kernel- |rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
--
Configur
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
61 matches
Mail list logo
