https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #21 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) ---
(In reply to wse from comment #20)
> I found more TF devices with this problem. I sent the patch directly to
> stable, but that might have been wrong?
>
> How do you post
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #20 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
I found more TF devices with this problem. I sent the patch directly to stable,
but that might have been wrong?
How do you post commits that are only required on stable and not on upstream?
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #19 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) ---
> But I guess the patch series is only for upcomming kernel and not for stable?
Correct.
> So distros using a lts kernel still need the quirk?
Yes.
> What do you think
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #18 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #17)
> > So distros using a lts kernel still need the quirk?
>
> With so many subsystems touched I think it's unlikely that this can come
> back
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #17 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> So distros using a lts kernel still need the quirk?
With so many subsystems touched I think it's unlikely that this can come back
to stable.
Hans,
As that patch
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #16 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #15)
> (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #14)
> > I see that series is reverting your quirks too. If it works for you, you
> > should add a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #15 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #14)
> I see that series is reverting your quirks too. If it works for you, you
> should add a link to this bug report and a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #14 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
I see that series is reverting your quirks too. If it works for you, you
should add a link to this bug report and a Tested-by for it.
--
You may reply to this email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #13 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #12)
> So you know - there is a series working on overhauling this registration
> stuff. Can you see how things behave with that series?
>
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #12 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
So you know - there is a series working on overhauling this registration stuff.
Can you see how things behave with that series?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #11 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> IBV
Independent BIOS vendor
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #9 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
Here is the patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c844d22fe0c0b37dc809adbdde6ceb6462c43acf
It does the same as setting the acpi_backlight=...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #8 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> So it's not specific to one OEM, but maybe a bug in the code that is provided
> by AMD to the OEMs?
AMD provides code to IBVs, and IBVs provide code to OEMs. It's
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #7 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
Created attachment 301402
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301402=edit
ACPI dump as binary for TongFang PF5NU1G bios version N.1.07.A05
Same issue with 5.19-rc6 on the TongFang
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #6 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
*the 5.19-rc6 kernel already has a workaround quirk for NL50RU and NL50NU
included.
But i will test a TongFang deice with the same issue and report back.
--
You may reply to this email to add a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #5 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
Created attachment 301401
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301401=edit
ACPI Dump in Binary for Clevo NL50RU BIOS 1.07.08TTR3
ofc here is the acpi dump.
TTR3 is a version of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #3 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
dmesg output of dangling sbios event with drm.debug=0x2 and backlight.dyndbg=+p
:
[ 44.596105] [drm:amdgpu_acpi_event [amdgpu]] event, device_class = video, type
= 0x81
[ 44.596351]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #2 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
Some more information after some digging and printf debugging:
This functions registers some stuff when acpi_backlight=video:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215683
--- Comment #1 from w...@tuxedocomputers.com ---
Forgot to add the devices are AMD APUs only devices with a 4700U and a 5500U
respectifly.
Pleas let me know which information can be helpfull for debugging.
--
You may reply to this email to add
23 matches
Mail list logo
