https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #19 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
I don't know. It depends on which place the bug ends up living. It's not a
Linux bug is all I'm saying closing this issue.
--
You may reply to this email to add a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #18 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #17)
> Having looked over that discussion; I'm confident this is a
> hardware/firmware bug, nothing for Linux to do here unless
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #16 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> So when PCI SMBUS controller raises IRQ, the kernel calls i8042's IRQ handler
> as usual?
In this case that's what I would expect happens. It's just like shared IRQ
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #15 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #14)
> That's not as straightforward a question as you may think. A bunch of
> non-obvious devices can also generate IRQ 1
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #14 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
That's not as straightforward a question as you may think. A bunch of
non-obvious devices can also generate IRQ 1 such as PCI SMBUS controller.
CRB doesn't generate EC
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #13 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #12)
> > Shouldn't IRQ1 be exclusive to i8042? Does APIC use the same hardware IRQ
> > line for different IRQs?
>
> It depends
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #12 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> Shouldn't IRQ1 be exclusive to i8042? Does APIC use the same hardware IRQ
> line for different IRQs?
It depends on OEM's design.
--
You may reply to this email to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #11 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #10)
> > If polarity is wrong, the keyboard won't work at all. So I don' think it's
> > the case here.
>
> Actually - It can
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #10 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
> If polarity is wrong, the keyboard won't work at all. So I don' think it's
> the case here.
Actually - It can be set in either direction as long as it's consistent
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #9 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #8)
> Thanks. It was a bit of a long shot that this helped this design, but that
> commit does fix some IRQ1 related problems
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #7 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
Created attachment 301486
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301486=edit
dmesg with the patch applied
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #6 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #5)
> Created attachment 301485 [details]
> patch to add more verbose logging
>
> Exactly the same? IRQ 1 shows at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #5 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
Created attachment 301485
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301485=edit
patch to add more verbose logging
Exactly the same? IRQ 1 shows at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
--- Comment #4 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #3)
> Can you please see if this still occurs with
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215770
Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
