http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 20:45 ---
Bjorn, can we close this bug as the patch is already upstream?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-13 10:41 ---
A patch similar to the one in comment #56 is in 2.6.26-rc6. If anybody can
test it and report the results, that would be great.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16246|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12190|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-22 10:22 ---
Thanks for the patch, Bjorn. Sadly, I no longer have that motherboard; I
upgraded (selling my old motherboard/CPU/RAM/video card) just last month;
otherwise I would gladly try
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-22 10:55 ---
If #53 is correct, then this is the same problem as bugzilla 9487.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-17 02:29 ---
Blacklisting BIOSes older than 2004 to use pnpbios as default instead of
pnpacpi?
Not because of this one.
If more machines pop up where this makes sense. I expect Bjorn knows
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-06 07:03 ---
Yes, I expect (at least some) people do not see a pnp bug, but parport_pc
driver problem.
AFAIK there exist some strange workarounds like reloading the driver in SUSE or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-12 03:41 ---
I was wrong, it's not the status.
I just tried on a machine with parallel port.
Switching to EPP in BIOS shows a PNP0400 device switching to ECP shows a
PNP0401 device in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-12 08:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=13513)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13513action=view)
Output of dmidecode
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-12 16:55 ---
Is it possible parport driver can always not use DMA, considering Winxp not use
DMA? Or can it detect if DMA is working, and disable it if not?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 07:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=13496)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13496action=view)
Disable pnpacpi on BIOSes older than 2004
2004 is just random for now.
If
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 11:58 ---
In case it might be helpful, here are the results of the modprobe commands:
ecp_probe=0 - prints fine
ecp_probe=1 - does not print at all
ecp_probe=2 - does not print at all
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 16:58 ---
Re comment #43, this suggests Thomas's guess is right, but I'm really confused
about this. pnpacpi should already check device's present bit. pnpacpi uses
acpi_bus_get_device
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 17:08 ---
Here you go:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /sys/devices/pnp0/*/id
PNP0a08
PNP0a03
PNP0c02
PNP0c02
PNP0200
PNP0b00
PNP0800
PNP0c04
PNP0700
PNP0501
PNP0401
PNP0f13
PNP0303
PNP030b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-09 02:36 ---
Could it be that PNPACPI does not check _STA when a device registers?
This would explain everything...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-09 07:28 ---
I recompiled the kernel after applying the provided patch, but when I tried to
modprobe the parport_pc module with the specified parameters (after first
rmmod-ing it), I get
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-09 08:45 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what was in dmesg?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-09 14:19 ---
[16418.046778] parport_pc: Unknown parameter `probe_ecp'
[16453.967575] parport_pc: Unknown parameter `probe_ecp'
[16457.777193] parport_pc: Unknown parameter `probe_ecp'
This
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-08 09:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=13469)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13469action=view)
Debug patch - 2.6.24-rc2 (might have slight offsets, but should patch...)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-08 08:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=13468)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13468action=view)
.config of 2.6.23-1
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-08 08:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=13467)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13467action=view)
acpidump of 2.6.23-1
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-08 08:45 ---
Attached is the output of acpidump. Oddly enough, after compiling the kernel
(2.6.23-1) with pnpacpi=y, the bug is not being manifested; I'm not sure why.
I have also
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-08 17:15 ---
In a WinXP, device manager has an option for parport to disable interrupt, and
this option is enabled by default, this suggests winxp doesn't use interrupt.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-07 02:50 ---
What should I type to get the desired output? Should I do this while running a
working kernel, or one displaying the bug? (I've since changed to Ubuntu
Gutsy, but I'm willing
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-07 18:42 ---
try pmtools at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/.
Better do this when the bug exists.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 22:31 ---
Is it possible the IRQ edge/level is wrong in the _CRS? We did find such buggy
BIOS. please attach the acpidump output, so we can check it.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-16 23:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=12414)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12414action=view)
Dmesg output after using the commands in comment #25.
I tried using the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-15 13:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12396)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12396action=view)
dump AML byte stream and ACPI resources
Does the printer work with any
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-11 12:02 ---
Thanks for your continued work on this bug.
I have booted into my Windows XP SP2 installation, and I was unable to find
anything in the device manager (using the resources by
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-07 10:56 ---
Thanks for trying those. But I'm afraid I wasted your time. This
tells us what we already knew: the port works when we run it with
interrupts and DMA disabled.
The question
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-05 01:31 ---
Looks like I spoke too soon. When trying to print multiple pages, or multiple
documents, I find that the printer will just hang until I killall -KILL
parallel (as root),
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-05 01:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12250)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12250action=view)
dmesg with both patches applied
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-30 23:16 ---
I have tested the IRQ patch with kernels 2.6.20-gentoo-r7 and 2.6.20-gentoo-r8,
and in both cases, applying the patch fixed the problem. I now have
CONFIG_PNP=y and
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-28 19:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=12190)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12190action=view)
disable PNP IRQ info
If this patch makes the port work, please attach the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-28 19:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=12191)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12191action=view)
disable PNP DMA info
If this patch makes the port work, please attach the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 01:04 ---
Try boot param pnpacpi=off. Helps for me in apparently similar problem.
(bugs.debian.org bug #406056)
Anyway, this is a temp-hack, not a SOLUTION
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-15 13:18 ---
The bug is back in Ubuntu kernel 2.6.15-20-amd64-generic. Since I don't print
much from ubuntu, the bug may also be there in the previous couple of releases
as well.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
|
52 matches
Mail list logo
