http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-04 12:17 ---
> But I do get your point, that if some laptops allow it to be left on it's
> probably better that way incase for example the battery should start to
> overheat.
Actua
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-01 08:01 ---
Does not compute. It won't wake up from suspend at all. I'll bisect that
tomorrow to see what broke it. In the mean time if there's more information
you'd like (lspci, .
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-01 06:43 ---
Please try 2.6.21-rc2. It sould contain all of the required fixes AFAICT.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-01 05:19 ---
Konstantin, ok.
Is the fan really supposed stay functional while suspended?
I doesn't do that on my machine. Once it goes down the fan's dead, with _D3 or
_D0. The only
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-01 04:18 ---
> Guys, am I missing something or shouldn't the fan set the power state to
ACPI_D3
> rather than ACPI_D0 in suspend?
It is safer to set the fan to D0 on suspend becaus
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-28 12:56 ---
Guys, am I missing something or shouldn't the fan set the power state to ACPI_D3
rather than ACPI_D0 in suspend?
Changing that as I described in http://lkml.org/lkml/20
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Additional Comments Fro
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-20 07:43 ---
According to the above mentioned kernel git log, patches from #7689 are also
merged in.
Commits:
a1cec06177386ecc320af643de11cfa77e8945bd
82dd9eff4bf3b17f5f511ae931a1f3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-20 06:30 ---
You should also include these:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7689
and be sure thermal polling is not that high, e.g. set it to 15 secs in:
echo 15 >/proc/ac
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-20 05:20 ---
Thanks for your rapid response. I'm a bit puzzled by the number of patches in
both bug reports but I just remembered the git repository.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-19 22:40 ---
Most problems are fixed by patches in #5534.
Problems with suspend/resume are fixed here (you need 5534 fixes already
applied).
--- You are receiving this mail bec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-19 17:56 ---
Hi everybody,
I will be the (unfortunate) owner of one nx6325 (don't think I can change this).
Imagine me, a new to the Linux-on-notebook arena going through everything
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-15 22:50 ---
refreshed comment #52 patch in comment #69 applied to acpi-test
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-11 18:40 ---
Status Update
2.6.20 with Ralfaels patches seem to be working well. Have been testing them
with suspend to ram using swsup, fedora core 6, ati binary driver.
I'm current
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-06 11:20 ---
First, I'd like to apologize everyone for the premature conclusion in Comment
#81. The patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9746&action=view actually
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-06 09:58 ---
In (latest!, I doubt this already hit the update process) SUSE 10.2 kernel the
psmouse things are fixed (there psmouse is built in, so serio drivers get
unload on shut
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 19:15 ---
Rafael,
Is there something special in suse 10.2 outside of the kernel that makes things
work? I'm on fedora and trying to figure out how to get there.
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 10:33 ---
After upgrading from SuSE 10.1 to OpenSUSE 10.2, I've noticed that the patch
from Bug #5534 that I used
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9746&action=view, o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-31 21:16 ---
Thanks to Rafael and Comment 72, i now have a working notebook.
acpi seems to work very well (i am now using the 2.6.20rc5 kernel for two
weeks). The hibernation doesnt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-27 12:46 ---
Augmenting comment #78
After removing psmouse, I'm pretty happy with the results. Both suspend and
resume seem to be working fairly well.
Question: Which bios should we
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-24 08:22 ---
In reply to comment 76.
No I didn't unload the mouse. I will give that a shot soon and post results.
For reference.
nx6325
Using Fedora core 6 x86_64 2.6.20-rc5 with Ra
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-23 08:43 ---
I noticed another effect with 2.6.20-rc5 with Rafael's patches: often (but not
always) the fan keeps running at a low speed and never turns off. If this
happens, the onl
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-23 03:46 ---
Referring to Comment #75:
Yes, there is.
Do you unload psmouse before the suspend?
BTW, in my previous posts "suspend" means "hibernate". Frankly, I haven't used
th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-22 18:10 ---
Tried 2.6.20-rc5 with Rafaels patches and can say that hibernate through KDE
works. Suspend still has issues and I can confirm the same as comment #71 that
the machine
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-19 18:22 ---
If I patch 2.6.20-rc5 with all the patches Rafael had collected, I once again
have working fans both before and after resume. Thanks, Rafael!
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-19 08:00 ---
Referring to Comment #72
Ah, I tend to forget about one important thing. I have to remove the psmouse
module before each suspend to disk (to prevent some strange thing
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-18 15:22 ---
Actually, I use these two patches with the 2.6.20-rc5 kernel on nx6325 and the
work for me just fine, but _additionally_ I need to use one patch from
Bug #5534.
All of
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-18 15:12 ---
I patched 2.6.18.5 with patches from comment 38 and 52.
Notebook: nx6325
first, acpi seemed to work. But after some time, fan blows harder and i wonder
why.
so i type a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-17 20:15 ---
Unfortunately the patch from comment 67 doesn't seem to work for me. I patched
2.6.20-rc3 with that patch and with the patch from comment 186 in bug 5534. The
patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 13:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=10022)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10022&action=view)
the same patch for kernel 2.6.20-rc3
Original patch in comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 20:51 ---
Tried on nx6325 and it seems to work for me.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-08 09:28 ---
The patch that should resolve the fan_resume problem is available from here
(Bug #7570):
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9757&action=view
It fixed the iss
gards,
Otto Meijer
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Bug 7122] Thermal management problems - HPC nx6325
>Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:01:11 -0800
>
>http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
>
>
>
>
>
>--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-04 14:57 ---
Hi, I have the same fan problem after S3 suspend on my HP NC6000 notebook, on
2.6.19. I have no DSDT errors and no errors are printed to dmesg. I cannot
transition fan
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 10:55 ---
And what about the patch from Comment #38? AFAICT it's also needed ...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-13 23:27 ---
patch in comment #52 applied to acpi-test
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-13 20:05 ---
I abandoned the 2.6.18.1 kernel in favor of the 2.6.18.2 one since I've got
unstable behaviour of SATA driver during suspend phase. I also solved LCD
problem - it was DP
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-11 00:56 ---
I use these patches on a regular basis on nx6325 and I haven't observed any
strange symptoms related to them, but I don't use suspend to RAM. Also, I
suspend to disk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-10 19:34 ---
I've been testing the patch from comment #52 along with the
patches from bug 5534 against 2.6.18.1
kernel for several weeks. Generally speaking they work fine. However t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-01 23:57 ---
It should have the patches from bug 5534, but I don't think it has the patch
from comment 52.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC li
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-31 04:28 ---
Does Linux Kernel 2.6.19-rc4 have all these parches applied or should I apply
any specific patch before testing?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-30 19:07 ---
I've now spent a few days running 2.6.18 with the patch from comment 52 and with
the two patches from bug 5534 and despite my best attempts, I have not been able
to get
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-25 00:36 ---
Yes. I didn't realize that, sorry. In which case the patch from Comment #50
is correct. Sorry again.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-24 23:12 ---
The patch from comment #38 changes ACPI resume handlers to occur in pm_finish,
after invocation of _WAK method. At this point memory management should be
already ok, i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-24 14:03 ---
Well, the problem of GFP_KERNEL vs _resume() is that swsusp calls _resume()
when normal memory management mechanisms are not fully functional.
Consequently, if it hap
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9336 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9335 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-23 13:00 ---
Okay, it looks like a replacement for the patch from Comment #37 and Comment
#41.
I have one comment: It generally is not a good idea to use GFP_KERNEL in the
_resume
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-23 12:16 ---
Is it a replacement for one or more of the other patches or should it be
applied on top of them?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-23 12:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=9335)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9335&action=view)
power resource references implemented as a list
Here is the patch f
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-18 11:15 ---
Unfortunately I managed to make the temperature readings hang again. After
resume, I started a script that periodically does "acpi -t". I use the ondemand
cpufreq govern
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-17 20:28 ---
I've now compiled 2.6.18 with the patches from comment 38 (not 37 as I stated
before) and comment 41, along with the two patches from bug 5534.
I'm happy to report that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-17 10:07 ---
I applied the patches from comment 41 (with some changes by hand to make it
apply) and comment 37 to 2.6.18 and have now suspended to disk successfully
several times, wi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9263|Modified patch from Comment |Modified power
description|#37
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 08:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=9263)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9263&action=view)
Modified patch from Comment #37
This is a modified version of the p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 07:19 ---
Referring to Comment #35:
I use "shutdown", but my box is different.
Could you please check if the patches from Comment #37 and Comment #38 fix the
problem for you?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 05:59 ---
This patches are against 2.6.18-rc6
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 04:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=9255)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9255&action=view)
ACPI suspend resume patch
--- You are receiving this mail beca
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 04:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=9254)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9254&action=view)
power suspend/resume patch
There was another problem observation on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments F
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-15 22:12 ---
I tried removing the patch from comment 27 and it didn't help, I still get stuck
temperature readings. It's possible that the fault lies with Ubuntu's suspend
scripts, t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-14 03:58 ---
Well, could you please verify if the resume-related problem is present in
2.6.18 with the final patches from Bug #5534 but without the patch from Comment
#27?
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-13 15:37 ---
I just tried rmmod'ing psmouse before suspend and modprobing it again on resume.
Unfortunately there are still problems - this time the temperature reading got
stuck at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 14:53 ---
There seems to be some black magic happening during the resume on the newer HPs
related to ACPI vs the psmouse module.
Please try to remove psmouse before the suspend
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 22:33 ---
Thanks, but even with the last two patches from bug 5534, things are still not
working perfectly. For instance, after the last resume I got a temperature
reading stuck a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 11:50 ---
This is yet another issue. You _additionally_ need to apply final patches from
Bug #5534 to fix it.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 09:11 ---
2.6.18 with the patch from comment 27 does not work well on my nx6125. The fans
do not turn on when the temperature goes above 57 degrees (one of the trip
points), unles
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |high
Kernel Version|2.6.18-rc5-mm1,
78 matches
Mail list logo
