http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #19 from [EMA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 20:50 ---
As the patch is already in Len's tree, I think we can mark this bug as
RESOLVED.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 09:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=15750)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15750&action=view)
dmesg
The patch works fine for me, each data is attached to a node.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 21:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=15744)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15744&action=view)
patch mentioned in comment #4
Please give it a try
--
Configure bugmai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 20:45 ---
Working with Ming, and we found that in Linux (ACPICA20070126), the type of
Alias device CPU1 is "processor", thus Linux will add a duplicate processor
device.
But when using la
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 20:40 ---
Hmm, they don't share the some namespace node, the two nodes share the same
attached object. And acpi_attach_data will attach the data to the attached
object, which is the same
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 18:33 ---
"ACPI Error attaching device data" should always be shown if Alias device
exists in the ACPI namespace.
Linux OS builds a device node for every ACPI device and trys to attach t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 03:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=15740)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15740&action=view)
dmesg
after kernel-2.6.25-rc9 vanilla patched with the proposed patch
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 19:08 ---
we need to get the fix from ACPICA 20071019 and attach a linux version here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-24 19:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=15421)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15421&action=view)
Debug patch
Please apply this debug patch and attach the FULL dmesg outpu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-24 00:17 ---
Ming and Bob,
what's the status of this bug?
Is the fix already included in the recent ACPICA release?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_config-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-16 00:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=13577)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13577&action=view)
lspci -vvxxx for x86_64
The machine is used for other project now.
I only
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-16 00:22 ---
Will you please attach the following info?
a. dmesg
b. lspci -vvxxx
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-16 00:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=13576)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13576&action=view)
dmesg log for x86
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-14 22:21 ---
Thank you.
I am not familier with ASL. Excuse me, how to check whether the ACPICA 20071019
is ok or not on the above kernels?
Regards
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-14 15:17 ---
This may be fixed in ACPICA 20071019:
Fixed a problem with the Alias operator when the target of the alias is a named
ASL operator that opens a new scope -- Scope, Device, Powe
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 18:14 ---
Part of AML for the NG machine. Seems like Alias description is reason
DefinitionBlock ("NG/DSDT.aml", "DSDT", 1, "HP", "ML115 G1", 0x0100)
{
:
Scope (_PR)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 18:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=13500)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13500&action=view)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-11 18:04 ---
already mentioned on
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05865.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
25 matches
Mail list logo
