http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #49 from [EMA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-23 15:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=16262)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16262&action=view)
PNPACPI: use _CRS IRQ descriptor length for _SRS
This bug is not fixed in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-13 19:00 ---
yes, it would be great if we could find out if 2.6.25 fixed this
or if we still have this problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 09:32 ---
> Are we still broken?
Yes, I think so, but that is based on looking at the code, not on actual
testing since my R25 won't let me boot anymore and is lying disassembled on the
f
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 20:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=15993)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15993&action=view)
patch included in linux-2.6.25-rc16
The attached patch shipped in linux-2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-29 18:02 ---
Linux doesn't use acpi_resources throughout, but instead stores the information
in generic resources (pnpacpi_parse_allocated_*), which are encoded to
acpi_resources (pnpacpi_en
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-29 15:06 ---
Comment 42#:
Please explain in detail why this patch is needed, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15440|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 19:34 ---
The patch in comment #39 was created automatically using acpisrc and lindent.
#40 contains the required declarations and code that transfers the information
from _CRS to _SRS us
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 19:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=15440)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15440&action=view)
required linux-side changes
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kerne
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15002|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-24 09:46 ---
The change was released in ACPICA 20080213:
Fixed a problem where resource descriptor size optimization could cause a
problem when a _CRS resource template is passed to a _SRS
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-24 00:36 ---
Yes, it is.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-24 00:31 ---
Bob,
Is the fix in the recent ACPICA release?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-26 00:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=15002)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15002&action=view)
Linuxized version of the patch in #28
I've adapted the proposed ACPCIA ch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14848|text/x-diff |text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-14 19:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=14848)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14848&action=view)
separated parts of the earlier patch independent from discriptor length is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-14 18:36 ---
The problem I see concerns StartDependentFn descriptors more than it does IRQ
descriptors. If we take the linux kernel as an example,
pnpacpi_build_resource_template in rsparse
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-12 09:17 ---
I was thinking that if a "valid" DescriptorLength is passed (2 or 3), then we
use that value. Anything else means "don't care", let the code figure out what
is best. This at le
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-11 21:12 ---
Looks good. I've just got one question: If an invalid DescriptorLength is
passed, AcpiRsSet* falls back on the old behavior of optimizing the descriptor
if possible. Is there
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-07 13:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=14744)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14744&action=view)
Alternate implementation of ACPICA-core changes
This patch provides a mo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|PATCH_ALREA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-17 16:00 ---
I have an issue with:
if (data.irq.descriptor_length == ACPI_DESCRIPTOR_4_BYTES)
If the field is named "length", I think that it should hold the actual length
of the descript
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-17 15:43 ---
The only other descriptor that has optional fields is the
StartDependentFunctions descriptor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:56 ---
>From Phoenix:
"The original PNP spec stated that the exact format of _CRS must be matched
with the subsequent _SRS"
So, the patch above seems to be moving in the right direc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 13:14 ---
What we seem to be saying here is that there is some requirement that the _SRS
buffer be the exact same size as the _CRS buffer, at least on some systems. The
ACPI spec only sa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 11:56 ---
I don't think that is what Windows does since bug 6316 was caused by a device
that couldn't deal with an unoptimized IRQ descriptor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 07:50 ---
I'd almost say to heck with trying to optimize a 3-byte IRQ descriptor to the
2-byte version and always output the 3-byte version. This would actually
*remove* some ACPICA code
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|buggy firmware expects four-|buggy firmware expects four-
34 matches
Mail list logo
