http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-29 01:05 ---
hi, Mihail,
sorry for the late response, does the problem still exist in a later kernel?
Please do the test in comment#41.
Please set CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG,
echo 0x044 > /sys/modul
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-25 06:14 ---
Yes I can.
>This suggest that the _BQC method return the correct brightness level rather
than the next not current level.
NO you don`t ynderstand me. In the case of use cat /sys
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 17:59 ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> At first when I kill acpid I can control brightness both via fn keys.
> when I use fn keys!
> There is a sequence of brightness levels when I use fn
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 12:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=14566)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14566&action=view)
DSDT
Just for fun. There is my ACPI DSDT that I have dissassembled. You c
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 12:46 ---
Zhang
At first when I kill acpid I can control brightness both via /proc /sys and fn
keys. So as I use debian unstable mabye problem not in kernel... There is many
stranges in u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-22 18:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=14539)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14539&action=view)
patch: return current brightness level gotton from _BQC
>The _BQC method
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-22 18:55 ---
>1) When I press fn key acpi_video_device_notify() with right event...
Maybe a user space script is monitoring the ACPI events and poking the
brightness switch I/F.
Please re-do
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-22 16:39 ---
I alredy have applied the patch in comment#11 (As far as I understand this
patch is already in .24-rc8)
With this patch I
1) can control brightness via /proc and /sys
2) I can`t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #35 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|low |blocking
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||9243
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|REOPEN
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocking|low
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 17:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=14443)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14443&action=view)
The patch for video.c driver that solve the part of a problem
So there is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 12:36 ---
Ok, according to your DSDT, brightness events come as _Q07 and _Q10, as well as
_Q11 and _Q12. You could check if they are sent by inserting printk("%x",value)
to
acpi_ec_gpe_qu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 12:08 ---
I haven`t got any events in /proc/acpi/events nor with patc nor without patch.
What do you mebb under uinput events?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpref
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 11:31 ---
By events I mean either /proc/acpi/events or uinput events. i8042 is a keyboard
controller and should not work here (thus it's interrupts should not appear).
Please read bug #92
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 11:06 ---
Yes I can.
1) plain 2.6.24-rc7
fn+fx generates no events (I thing interupts). I decided so because
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c:
static irqreturn_t i8042_interrupt(int irq, void
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 10:36 ---
Ok, could you please give symptoms sorted:
1. plain 2.6.24-rc7
2. 2.6.24-rc7 and commented out "if(..._INI) section"
3. 2.6.24-rc7 and patch from bug #9627
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 10:13 ---
OK, I understand your explanation but I don`t understand one little thing from
it:
>init of EC could be (and should be) done after all ACPI devices and regions
>are initialized
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 09:22 ---
Mikhail,
Let's define terms... in #23 you mentioned patched kernel -- what patch did you
use? Strange numbers appear as each keypress gives you two
increments/decrements in brig
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 08:51 ---
>is this really closed as a duplicate of bug 9627?
I think that this problem doesn`t solved! ACPI behaviour is incorrect for my
mind
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ke
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 08:49 ---
So one more interesting thing,
When I Use X with the patched kernel - there is _INI, and X loaded after video
module brightness control keys doesn`t work under X (v7.3)! If I un
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-13 03:39 ---
Hi,
Only one question:
hy when i haven`t got _INI all fn keys works and video.c works (It shows some
usefull information...)
But when I have _INI works only fn or video.c but no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 04:55 ---
OK, but all, not only brightness control, fn keys stops working. What about
them?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 01:07 ---
You could just try to disable call to _DOS -- this function will disable BIOS
control over brightness.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 16:40 ---
The sequence of execution and params in functions in video.c are the same in
both cases - when _INI disabled and when _INI enabled. But results aren`t the
same :(
--
Configur
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:47 ---
You might also want to experiment with calls to _DOS in drivers/acpi/video.c
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:30 ---
I will try to do it now...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC lis
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:27 ---
Please try to disable ACPI/video in .config
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:22 ---
Yes I tried.
fn keys doesn`t work in that case.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 15:13 ---
_INI presence check works in exactly opposite way, -ENODEV is returned if it is
not present, which is true on your machine (it does not have any _INI methods
depending on EC reg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|low |blocking
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 14:45 ---
So I`m sorry for grammar in my messages.
About toshoba.c I can say that this driver isn`t support toshiba laptops with
phoenix bios. More of all last laptops came with this bios
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocking|low
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|blocking
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 12:18 ---
So I have rtied patch from bug #9627 with .24-rc7 -- so we returned to the bug
#9663
We have got fully working /sys but fukky bloked fn keys that even hasn`t
generated interupt`s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 11:12 ---
OK I`l try.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 10:28 ---
Mihail,
Please try -rc7 with patch from bug #9627.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 10:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=14416)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14416&action=view)
The result of acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from [EM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 02:17 ---
>duplicate of bug 9663?
There was solved one but there is another...
so mabye
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-11 02:14 ---
I only rty to use linux debian with recompiled kernels, which has been taken
rfom official kernel site.
I try 2.6.[22,23,24-rc[6,7]] and in all them I watch this bug.
All other p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-10 17:43 ---
duplicate of bug 9663?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
51 matches
Mail list logo
