[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-06-18 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-06-18 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-06-18 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-04-02 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-04-02 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 12:16 --- *** Bug 10383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-04-02 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 12:37 --- The visit table (from comment #15) is missing the SSDT in the table header. This is clearly a BIOS bug. It has a backlight brightness method and USB wakeup functions included.

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-04-02 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-27 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-27 10:05 --- Sorry for the slow reply, been a busy couple of days for me. Testing this as we speak, I'm assuming you actually meant the patch in bug #9488? Looks like by using

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-27 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-27 11:48 --- Created an attachment (id=15028) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15028action=view) *without* acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 passed Created with: grep -e

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-27 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-27 11:49 --- Created an attachment (id=15029) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15029action=view) *with* acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 passed Created with: grep -e

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-21 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 01:12 --- Will you please try the debug patch in comment #8 of bug 9448 and enable the enable the debug function of cpufreq amd acpi in kernel configuration ? After the system is booted

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |m

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-20 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-20 03:59 --- Created an attachment (id=14912) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14912action=view) acpidump --addr 0x7F6CDAFC --length 0x35A -o vist -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-16 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-16 03:26 --- Created an attachment (id=14855) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14855action=view) acpidump --addr 0x7f6cacd0 --length 0x1f6 -o cpu0ist -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-16 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14855|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-16 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-16 03:28 --- Created an attachment (id=14856) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14856action=view) acpidump --addr 0x7f6cacd0 --length 0x1f6 -o cpu0ist -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-16 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-16 03:28 --- Created an attachment (id=14857) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14857action=view) acpidump --addr 0x7f6cb118 --length 0xb8 -o cpu1ist -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-16 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-16 03:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14858) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14858action=view) acpidump --addr 0x7f6cb1d0 --length 0x5cd -o cpu0cst -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-16 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-16 03:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14859) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14859action=view) acpidump --addr 0x7f6cb798 --length 0xb8 -o cpu1cst -- Configure

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-14 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-14 16:28 --- An interesting side effect of acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 seems to be that after a suspend-to-ram/resume cycle I no longer receive and LID events (although I do receive power button

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-14 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-14 19:07 --- Hi, Alexander Will you please use the following command and attach the outpus? acpidump --addr 0x7f6cacd0 --length 0x1f6 -o cpu0ist acpidump --addr 0x7f6cb118 --length 0xb8

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-09 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- |

[Bug 9919] acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 else cpufreq breaks - Fujitsu T2010

2008-02-09 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-09 02:14 --- Created an attachment (id=14763) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14763action=view) acpidump spiel for the Fujitsu Lifebook T2010 Unsure how useful this would