Re: [ActiveDir] WINS/DHCP/DNS in Win2k

2002-01-09 Thread rrutherford
I suggest the best way would be to Install Wins,DHCP, and DNS on the new W2K server and disable on the old NT4 box for fail back purposes during your migration. Change your DHCP scopes on the new Server to include the new DNS and WINS servers, configure DNS... Make any changes to any static

[ActiveDir] NAT'd DNS Server - Kinda AD related

2002-01-09 Thread Pat Hastings
HI, Just wondering if anyone has come across this before. I have Win2k machine which is kinda an all in one work horse DNS/DC/exchange server. It is also NAT'd so that it has both an internal address and an external one. This then plays merry hell with the DNS in that any a records eg mail etc

RE: [ActiveDir] WINS/DHCP/DNS in Win2k

2002-01-09 Thread Flanagan, Kevin
That's basically it, if you search technet.microsoft.com you'll find the way to migrate DHCP scopes which is the biggest pain in the butt, unless your environment is small, in that case I'd just build it all from scratch. +__+ "There are two major products

Re: [ActiveDir] WINS/DHCP/DNS in Win2k

2002-01-09 Thread Neil Smith
MS produced a utility for migrating scopes between NT4 and W2K. Can't remember the name of it - I'll have a hunt around It was available on their website a few months ago. Trying having a search Best... Neil - Original Message - From: "Flanagan, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[E

[ActiveDir] RAS...

2002-01-09 Thread Blair, James
All,   With Windows 2000 RAS we are logging incoming calls however interpreting these logs is something else...it is SWAHILI to me...is there a utility or program out there to interpret these logs...even the column headers would be nice...we are using RAS policies and would like to check the

RE: [ActiveDir] RAS...

2002-01-09 Thread Bryan Schlegel
Couple good articles... http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7958 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q181431 -Original Message- From: Blair, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:35 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject