Title: Message
Joe,
Someone explained the so-called 'island problem' as to a good reason TO
point your DNS servers at each other; e.g DNS A point to DNS B. It was a
good explanation, so nothing more need be said.
What I
haven't seen referenced in all this is:
Joe> I have also been havi
Hello all -
I would like to create a logon script that
would check for a particular key in the registry and if it exists...delete it
silently...any best ideas?
Thanks!
Max
Exchange was a bit different. We wanted a clone (to a point) of our
Exchange 5.5 stuff in the lab to nail down the Exchange 2000 upgrade. Our
Ex5.5 is (was) in a dedicated "exchange" NT 4.0 resource domain. We cloned
the domain in the lab and for the exchange piece we had to create the
exchange
Thanks for all the tips, let the games begin.
-Original Message-From: Ayers, Diane
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002
11:47To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Forest Prep and ADC
That's the process we followed in our site. we just ran our f
Your DNS is registered with someone to resolve your domain name to your
name server address. If your External interface of the Lynksys router
changes then the resolution to your name server (your router that does
port forwarding to your DNS server) is no longer valid. Find a free dns
service, th
Two remote and one at the console.
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:06 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Terminal Services and Connections
TS remote admin only allows 2 administrators to logon
--
How did you clone Exchange servers while changing the NetBIOS name of
your cloned domain? What happen to the primary accounts associated with
the mailboxes? Was an Exchange migration part of your plan? Just
curious...
-Original Message-
From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
Hey,
I am attempting to remove a domain trust and the following message appears.
The directory service is busy
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanx
Don
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive
Good point. That is critical. The NetBIOS names of the domain was changed.
It was an NT 4.0 clone that was used to test and verify our Win2K upgrade to
AD. A DC was yank off, isolated, made a PDC and the domain renamed. A
complete separate DNS, WINS infrastructure was built to support the test
Current home setup:
I have DSL w/dynamic IP Address/Linksys Router/W2K w/AD-Integrated DNS zone.
I've enabled port forwarding on my Linksys Router to make my web and email
servers available. Single name space. TZO Service & Client that manages
external DNS records and dynamic IP addressing.
1 DC -
TS remote admin only allows 2 administrators to logon
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:50 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[ActiveDir] Terminal Services and Connections
I use Terminal Services on remote
No problem. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hayes, Shawn
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Very OT: RE: [ActiveDir] Where should DNS point?
I didn't mean to yell, I apologizetoo much coffee
I didn't mean to yell, I apologizetoo much coffee this morning :( And by the
definition below it wasn't SPAM.just Junk Mail like this message. I am glad you
explained it to Chris, because I didn't get it either. This is the end for
mesorry to all for this message
-Original Me
OK, so you are saying you changed the Netbios name of the domain for the
cloned domain? What type of domain is this NT or 2K?
Without changing the NETBIOS domain name for the cloned domain you will
need to be in an isolated environment.
-Original Message-
From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:
Spam, Definition: Inappropriate commercial message of extremely low value.
As you say, if you're not connected to the show at all and will not receive any
commercial reward for publicising the show, that wasn't SPAM.
So, stop the idle chit chat and start debating RFC 1869 or something equally
i
Title: Message
Calm
down!
-Original Message-From: Hayes, Shawn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002
16:22To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Very
OT: RE: [ActiveDir] Where should DNS point?
enough said, STOP WITH THE SPAM
-Original Message-Fro
Title: Message
Ah, I
see. I've only watched Fox News once or twice - it's very amusing that
they try and pass it off as a serious news channel! I didn't appreicate
quite how good BBC News was until I watched Fox!
-Original Message-From: T Bowman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S
Actually you can have it on the same wire. We have our lab that is a clone
of the production domain on our net with the production domain. The key
point is that you have to keep your namespaces separate and unique (NetBIOS,
DNS and WINS)
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Hayes, Shawn [mai
That's the process we followed in our site. we just ran our first CA's last
week for 20,000 users without one error. WooHoo!. I'd like to add a couple
of points
* There is a /schemaonly switch for the ADC install if you want to do
that first before installing the ADC.
* If poss
Title: Message
How
could that be SPAM? ... and you don't have to shout.
I am
in no way connected to the show or FoxNews or anything else.
It was
a friendly conversation. Ease up.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hayes,
Shawn
Title: Message
enough
said, STOP WITH THE SPAM
-Original Message-From: T Bowman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:20
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Very OT: RE:
[ActiveDir] Where should DNS point?
Bill
O'Reilly is an Author and Political Co
Title: Message
Bill
O'Reilly is an Author and Political Commentator on FoxNews. He's quite
opinionated
and a
hoot! His show is called The O'Reilly Factor and his catch phrase as his
show
starts
is: "You are now entering the 'no spin zone'. Everyone should watch it at
least once.
My
r
Title: Message
I
didn't get it :P
-Original Message-From: T Bowman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 15:35To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Where should
DNS point?
Sorry, it was supposed to be a joke. :|
-Original Message-From:
All of the Microsoft documentation notes a maximum of 2 active or
inactive logons when in remote administration mode.
Regards,
Benton Chase Wink
-
Benton Chase Wink, CCNA MCSE
McCombs School of Business
LAN Administrator, Network Team
512-471-99
No, I think he's referring to remote assistance in XP professional.
AFAIK, they haven't changed the Terminal Services arrangement much in
.Net server apart from adding functionality (like sound, increased
colour depth etc). XP Pro also supports traditional RDP access, where
you get 1 TS session, w
Title: Message
Sorry,
it was supposed to be a joke. :|
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
McEvoySent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:21 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Where should
DNS point?
Beg
pardo
Title: Message
Beg
pardon?
-Original Message-From: T Bowman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 15:11To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Where should
DNS point?
Well, Factor THAT!! I watch The Factor but had no idea he was
also a Techie! ;)
Title: Message
One DNS server should be your Primary, even if AD
integrated, it should be the first DNS server established. Secondary
DNS servers should be another DNS box for the root and itself for the additional
DNS servers. This way DCPROMO knows where to go to find existing service
re
Title: Message
Well,
Factor THAT!! I watch The Factor but had no idea he was also a Techie!
;)
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
McEvoySent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:44 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
So on .net you can share the remote connection?
How many does it allow?
Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.profit-lab.com
http://ncontrol.info
-Original Message-
From: Nah Idee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:01 AM
To
This is fact. On XP though, MS has taken TS and vnc'ed it, ie there is only
one remote session allowed and it can be a shared one, unlike win2000.
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Sykes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: RE: [Activ
As far as I know, you get 2 remote admin connections and the console
login does not affect the TS behaviour in any way.
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 14:50
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Terminal Services and
I use Terminal Services on remote Admin Mode
I was under the impression that it would allow 3 connections to the machine.
I have a few questions with this:
1. Does TS reserve 1 connection for the local machine logon?
2. If #1 is yes is there any way to force it to allow that reserve to be
used
Title: Message
Joe -
one other thing (didn't read your original post closely enough, I
guess)...
By
default, each DC will register _ldap and _kerberos records for itself in its own
site, as well as for itself in the _tcp.dc._msdcs zone for the domain. If
a client can't find a DC registered
Title: Message
Joe -
We've
come to understand that it's best to point the primary DNS setting of a DC to a
different DC in that domain. The reason is something often called the
"island problem". Replication relies on those CNAME records that contain a
GUID, and they are dynamically added
Title: Message
Joe,
Assuming you have 2 DCs, then they points to each other i.e. DC A point
to DC B and DC B points to DC A. The reason is that if you happens to
change the IP on one of your DCs then it will replicate
correctly.
Hope
this explains it.
-Original Message-Fro
Title: Message
How many domain controllers do you have DNS installed
on?
Which DNS server do u want the DC to resolve to
(depending on subnet)?
If you want it to resolve to the subnet it is now on,
of course you do. There is no other way unless you install DNS on a 'member'
server and no
Title: Message
Thx for the quick replys, but I guess I didn't
really explain very well what I was asking. The question is not whether I
can run DNS on my DC, which is what I am doing. Rather, on my TCP/IP
setting on my domain controllers, should my Primary DNS setting be set to its
own IP
Title: Message
Joe,
I run DHCP, DNS and an Exchange2K (2560 user accounts)
on the DC of an internal LAN test network and have had no problems. If you are
looking for an online resource to guide you through the setting up of DNS in AD:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q2
Title: Message
Active
Directory Sites and services, add subnets and assign them to their specific
sites. Clients on the specified subnets will log on to DC's located
at those sites.
DNS---from what I understand needs to be on the DC's if you plan to use
Active Directory integrated zones..
Title: Message
O'Rielly's DNS on Windows 2000 is a good resource and gives you pretty
much all the information you need.
I
personally run my DNS server on a DC. How else would you get Exchange 2000
to run on a single server? Small Business Server also has this
configuration I believe.
I was once told by a Microsoft consultant that you
should never point your DCs to themselves for DNS. (using AD integrated
DNS) So that is what I did. However, I have since
read Q article 275278, which seems to state the contrary. I have also been
having issues where my users in remote s
42 matches
Mail list logo
