RE: [ActiveDir] Script to find last logged on date

2002-12-17 Thread Andries Thijssen
Title: Message You could check the password age (assuming users are forced to change their passwords every now and then). Andries -Original Message-From: Byrne, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:59 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:

RE: [ActiveDir] Gathering Computer Account Info via script

2002-12-17 Thread Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO
Chris, you may want to create an ldap query in your vb script to what ever container you are trying to enumerate and run through each object in that container, write that to a csv (or text, whatever you need), and then move on to the next container. Nested for loops would probably be the

RE: [ActiveDir] Script to find last logged on date

2002-12-17 Thread Jimmy Andersson
Title: Message Usrstat.exe from the Resource Kit displays the user name, full name, and last logon date and time for each user in the domain.Regards,/Jimmy --Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice ABMicrosoft MVP - Active Directory www.qadvice.com -Original Message-From:

RE: [ActiveDir] Script to find last logged on date

2002-12-17 Thread Tom Meunier
Try the 30-day trial of RealLastLogon at tools4ever.com http://www.tools4ever.com/Products/rll/description.htm -Original Message- From: Byrne, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Script to find last logged on

RE: [ActiveDir] IIS logs

2002-12-17 Thread King, Arron S.
Title: Message We use Sawmill (http://www.sawmill.net/) It is not very expensive and provides a great deal of analysis with little investment in time for setup. HTH Arron === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University

RE: [ActiveDir] IIS logs

2002-12-17 Thread Jim Busick
Title: Message I downloaded MS's LogParser 2.0 tool just a couple of weeks ago but I just checked and the link to it comes up blank. Looks like they took it off the downloads. I like the tool, it supports SQL syntax and will work on many formats besides IIS. Contact me offline if you want

RE: [ActiveDir] NT/AD Backup Solutions?

2002-12-17 Thread McGhee , Maurice
Have you looked into Backup Exec by Veritas Software? -Original Message- From: Canzoneri, Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:[ActiveDir] NT/AD Backup Solutions? Hi All, We are currently looking at

RE: [ActiveDir] IIS logs

2002-12-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
I just started playing with Analog from http://www.analog.cx -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL

[ActiveDir] Root domain naming

2002-12-17 Thread Brad Martin
Im in the middle of having an argument with the IT manager about the top-level domain name for our new A.D. deployment. The manager wants to use a nonstandard name for the domain (ie. Dc1.domain.gd) for the root domain. My position, which Ive read a number of places, is that we should use

RE: [ActiveDir] Root domain naming

2002-12-17 Thread Shawn.Hayes
Title: Message That is the only reason I have heard that may make it worth the extra $10 bucks a year to register your name. Wouldn't this have also been the case if you merged with a company with the same NetBIOS name in NT 4.0? What is the probability of this happening?

RE: [ActiveDir] Little Questions

2002-12-17 Thread King, Arron S.
I would think putting Exchange aware a/v on all Exchange servers (regardless) would be a good idea. This should provide protection from internally-spawned viruses (say from a user who might have outlook connected to a POP3 server Exchange at the same time, or perhaps a user who gets a virus

RE: [ActiveDir] Outlook XP makes me want to throw it out the wind ow!

2002-12-17 Thread Chris J. Popp
An update: I have tried to remove the user profile and recreate a new one. Same result happens of being prompter for a password, and then being rejected. I have removed the account from Outlook and created a new one that points to the user's account in Ex2k sp3. Same result. I have followed

RE: [ActiveDir] AD and LDAP and single sign on for UNIX

2002-12-17 Thread jim . katoe
Using SFU is probably the most clear path to integration. However that tool allows Unix machines to authenticate against AD, not necessarily the other way around I think. The PDF that was posted is good reading. It indicates that LDAP is NOT an authentication protocol. They chose to build a

RE: [ActiveDir] AD and LDAP and single sign on for UNIX

2002-12-17 Thread Byrne, Steve
Title: Message Thanks, I will look into a commercial product as I think it will save me time in the long run.. A lot of people I have spoken to are under the impression that AD LDAP can be used as an authentication protocol. I see now this is not true, however I did read somewhere that LDAP

RE: [ActiveDir] Little Questions

2002-12-17 Thread Dave Kinnamon
Shawn, Any recommendations on a SMTP getway scanner (hardware or software) ? Dave K. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Little Questions Exchange Antivirus on

RE: [ActiveDir] Little Questions

2002-12-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
Trend Interscan Viruswall is the best one, IMO. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Dave Kinnamon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: [ActiveDir] Little Questions

2002-12-17 Thread Shawn.Hayes
We use Norton Antivirus for Gateways version 2.something. They have a newer version 3.0 that will allow spam filtering by sender name and/or spam lists(Spam lists by subscription $$$ from Mail Abuse Prevention systems, L.L.C). I also use this product to block attachments :-) -Original

RE: [ActiveDir] Little Questions

2002-12-17 Thread Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO
I second that. Antigen is very good. I would suggest keeping different vendor's AV solutions on your SMTP Gateway vs. your Exchange servers... If one of them doesn't catch it, the heuristics of the other AV engine (or the newer defs that one vendor releases before the other) might, increasing your

RE: [ActiveDir] AD and LDAP and single sign on for UNIX

2002-12-17 Thread jim . katoe
You can use SSL to encrypt an LDAP conversation just like HTTP. This increases security but it is not a substitute for authentication. You can also write your own SSPI if you know how to that could handle authentication for you, but that is only half of the problem. Byrne, Steve [EMAIL

[ActiveDir] the ADC (yeah, baby!)

2002-12-17 Thread Pelle, Joe
Title: the ADC (yeah, baby!) When creating the ADC to work with E5.5 and AD, what do you elect to do with the accounts the ADC creates? We're using a migration tool that will migrate users, and having the ADC create disabled users or contacts or enabled users seems like all bad choices (since

RE: [ActiveDir] the ADC (yeah, baby!) - Oh Behave!

2002-12-17 Thread Burns, Clyde
Title: the ADC (yeah, baby!) Highly highly highly recommend you go thru your exchange 5.5 user directory with NTDSNoMatch. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q274173If you get a one to one mapping between exch5.5 accounts and AD users it makes life alot easier. Of

[ActiveDir] Newbie Style Question

2002-12-17 Thread John Exum
Title: the ADC (yeah, baby!) I have found on Microsofts website a script that creates a share on a remote computer. I have also found a script on their site that will create a folder locally only. Does anyone have a script for creating a folder remotely so I can run the following script

[ActiveDir] the ADC (yeah, baby!)

2002-12-17 Thread jim . katoe
Return Receipt Your [ActiveDir] the ADC (yeah, baby!) document :

RE: [ActiveDir] the ADC (yeah, baby!)

2002-12-17 Thread Pelle, Joe
Title: Message Ah... Will merging them enable the account then? Joe Pelle Systems Administrator Information Technology Valassis / Targeted Print Media Solutions 35955 Schoolcraft Rd. Livonia, MI 48150 Tel 734.632.3753 Fax 734.632.6240 [EMAIL PROTECTED]