What type of workstations are connected? If it is NT 4.0 or Windows98,
perhaps shutting off browsing services on all servers...?
-Jon
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:46 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Act
Compaq services also has a nice one...
ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/supportinformation/papers/ps-99-23.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Tim Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD Disaster Recovery Book
See the A
See the AD disaster recovery whitepaper at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn
ol/ad/windows2000/support/adrecov.asp
Tim Hines, MCSA, MCSE (2000 & NT4)
MVP - Active Directory
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Baird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
I'm looking at blowing out and starting over on one of
my domain controllers. Currently I have two domain
controllers in the domain. The domain controller I
need to blow out run dns, dhcp and wins. It's a
windows 2000 environment. I also run exchange 2000 in
this environment. Does anybody know any
Anyone know of a good AD disaster recovery book? Only found one dedicated
book so far.
Thx, Joe
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
Yes there are numerous instances where that can be problematic, much depends on the
source of the HF's or QFE's involved. A couple of examples-
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;281767
http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=26166
59 Post-SP3 Hotfixes Conflic
Hey all,
I am starting (finally) to deploy XP SP1 and 2000 SP3 to our 1500
clients. I am wondering if when they get updates (q-patches, etc) from
Windowsupdate, a SUS server, or scripts that I run, if the Service Pack
will overwrite any newer files. So say they get a patch that is Pre-SP2
and then
Yeah, I figured it was being totally
locked out since you guys found the potential for exploit. As I don’t really
relish using hacking tools on my Active Directory, and Microsoft doesn’t
support it directly, I’m going to have to tell my guys here that isn’t not
going to be an option.
We have one system that has limitations to username length. This system
supports LDAP. We would like to configure it to authentication against our
W2k AD server. The same associates have accounts on the W2k server, however
their usernames are not limited in the same way. Is it possible to have AD
a
I think there are some people who can tell you how, but they will have to kill
you after that. ;)
Here
is the reason:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url="">
For further
reading:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">
Vladimir Turin
Aelita
Softw
I suppose you could permission it such that they can't see it. There are
probably downsides to doing that, however, that make it unwise.
Maybe teach them to ignore it?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harb
Title: Message
Hello
all,
We have a
functional 2-way trust established between an NT 4 domain and a Windows 2000 AD
Domain. In the AD, we have many user accounts in many different
containers.
When we try to assign users from the AD in security
principals in the NT 4 domain, we
Outlook will send a request from a high port on the
local machine to
port 135 on the Exchange server. The Exchange server will listen
on
Port 135 and respond on some high port.
TCP/IP communication
Also note it is a new TCP communication,
when the server contacts the client
A follow up: I was screwing up my syntax, which I've now
corrected, but now when I try I get an error message: "Error: Modify: Constraint
Violation <19>". I can change other values, just not the
sIDHistory one. This looks like a security feature so people can't modify
the sIDHistory and
Title: Message
This may be
unrelated to this newsgroup, but it's a simple idea. I have a forest root and 1
child domain. Is there a way to hide the forest root name from being listed when
people browse?
Chris Flesher
The University of Chicago
NSIT/DCS
1-773-834-8477
Is it possible, using LDP.EXE to change the sIDHistory value of a user
in the A.D.? I'd like to replace the existing sIDHistory with a new one,
but when I try a modify I get: "Error: Modify: Unwilling to perform
<53>" Is this just a rights issue with the user I'm binding
with, or is A.D.
Outlook will send a request from a high port on the local machine to
port 135 on the Exchange server. The Exchange server will listen on
Port 135 and respond on some high port.
TCP/IP communication
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursda
You don't seem to be listening.
The RPC endpoint mapper, which is what runs on port 135, is an initial
connection point for ALL RPC traffic. That's the port used to negotiate the
actual connections. All MAPI connections are RPC. What do you think the
answer is?
---
And the two Exchange servers are in the same Windows site and Exchange
site?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:31 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Protocols Required
So after you moved their mailboxes no
So after you moved their mailboxes no one was able to access their mailboxes
w/o recreating their Outlook profile to point to the new server?
Im missing something here.
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:23 AM
To:
It's the same MAPI conversion. Instead of connecting the user to their mailbox, the
server will give the client a referral to the new server on which the client's mailbox
resides.
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10
It needs connectivity to at least the endpoint mapper (port 135) and the
directory service. It might also need access to the information store.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlan
I agree, we have a site that has locked down their network too much and I am
not sure what ports needs to be open for all function of mapi work,
including outlook changing the server it logs into.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Jan
I know that, I just want to know if that request for the change still occurs
over port 135, I had a site that did not have outlook automatically
reconfigure after 3 weeks of the old server being up. DNS was right and so
was WINS.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Right, so does outlook still communicate over port 135 to change the server
-Original Message-
From: Carey, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Protocols Required
With the caveat that the
Access to the server maybe? I'd strongly suggest not trying to lock stuff
down this tightly if you don't understand the entire MAPI session process.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Greg is correct... If the mail store that the outlook profile is pointing to
no longer exists or is no longer contactable by the client, outlook will
never get repointed to the new location. In this case, you would have to
manually repoint the outlook profile to the new mail store to resolve the
ma
You need to leave the first server up in order for mapi to work its magic.
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:28 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Protocols Required
When you move a mailbox to anot
Right - it changes the SERVER. It is not going to change the port that
is used for the End Mapper. It will always be 135.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
> -Original Message-
> From
With the caveat that the old mail store remains up until the client connects.
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:28 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Protocols Required
When you move a mailbox to an
When you move a mailbox to another server, Outlook will automatically change
the server defined in the local profile.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] P
Justin,
I'm not sure what you mean by 'reconfiguring the server in the local
profile'? The requirement *is* to communicate over port 135. Outlook
cannot just arbitrarilly decide to communicate over another port to
support this - hence it cannot automatically reconfigure itself.
Rick Kingslan M
What would prevent Mapi Outlook clients from automatically reconfiguring the
server in the local profile?
Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailt
No. Something needs to point it to the correct ports.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
34 matches
Mail list logo
