Ran into the same issue when automating account creation where I work. Rather than
code cdo/mapi with the users credentials to have it finalize the mailbox creation I
use a command line utility call 'blat' to send the new account an email (yes I am a
lazy programmer). The reciept of the new emai
Title: Message
Damian,
Indeed, the servers are connected directly to the switch. I'm going
to dive in and have a look.
-Original Message-From: Scoles, Damian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:30
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD De
Sorry for the OT post here, but I expect if the answer is known, it will be
found here.
We have a third party hardware/software solution that runs Windows CE, and
has the capability to dial in, authenticate and communicate to a server
application via RAS. The security of this CE device is non-exi
If
you check out the following posts it has a full description and code on how to
do this
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ADSIANDDirectoryServices/message/5
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ADSIANDDirectoryServices/message/6
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ADSIANDDirectoryServices/message/7
ht
SO it is different from a Exchange 55 world then?
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Creating Mailbox in Ex2000
You're ok John.
While you have created the act
You're ok John.
While you have created the actual mailbox and profile. The process is
not actually complete until it is accessed for the first time.
-Original Message-
From: Mirochnik, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [
The mailbox is created but not fully, however you must wait for replication
to take place. I have noticed that when logging into outlook for the first
time the Calendar and one or two other items get created. Off the bat there
is just a inbox and associated items
-Original Message-
Fro
The mailbox is not created until you open the mailbox with Outlook
Cliff Connelly
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:13 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Creating Mailbox in Ex2000
What's the error?
Error: "Unable to Read Security Information from the Directory.
ID no: c1033028
Microsoft Active Directory-Exchange Extension"
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [
What's the error?
-Original Message-
From: Mirochnik, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Creating Mailbox in Ex2000
I'm trying to create a mailbox in Ex2000 by populating the following
attributes in AD:
hom
I'm trying to create a mailbox in Ex2000 by populating the following
attributes in AD:
homeMDB
homeMTA
msExchHomeServerName
mailNickname
The mailbox gets created but when in Users and Computers I open properties
and click on Mailbox
Rights button - I get an error instead of the list of permission
Title: Message
Completely agreed. That's why I suggested the traffic shaping
approach.
We've
done that successfully with some of our core applications, weighting the
priority of some over others. In the end though, some pipes are just too small.
In other cases, the way the prioritization i
We are in the process of rolling out an new desktop at MUSC using a W2K AD
infrastructure and an XP SP1 managed desktop.
We piloted out new desktop for about a month to gauge the user's
requirements for the new system. We had made the users domain account a
member of the local power users group a
I would not venture to answer that not having hands on experience with
it, perhaps someone else can comment.
I would assume that the 55 machine should be the local and the 2000
should be the remote, but we all know what assume means. J
Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
All,
Scenario:
I have a root domain
ds.abc.com and child domain us.abc.com located in the main office. The root has
two DC's which one DC1.mo.abc.com has PDC emulator, GC, Schema Master, Domain
Name and the other dc2.mo.abc.com has RID, and Infrastructure master roles. The
sub domai
I
believe you need to change the LDAP port on Exchange to something else like 390.
The 2K DC will use it's own LDAP on port 389. Do you see errors referencing LDAP
in the Application log?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224447
-Original Message-From: Pel
Not sure if any of this sheds light on anything...here's are the fsmo roles of each dc:
Office A:
ntdsutil: roles
fsmo maintenance: Connections
server connections: Connect to server pa-file-01
Binding to pa-file-01 ...
Connected to pa-file-01 using credentials of locally logged on user.
server co
Your Connection Agreement with the ADC should be
configured to go between your Windows 2000 Domain Controller (Windows Server)
and the SRS Server (Exchange Server). The SRS Server is your first installed
Exchange 2000 server (can't be on a cluster). Verify that the SRS is
running on that box
Is your CA
setup as a one way or a two way agreement?
I believe
that Exchange 55 and 2000 need to be setup to replicate the GAL thru the
Exchange 55 Replication topology in the Exchange Admin, but not having set this
up myself, I may be mistaken
Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Netw
Has anyone had the pleasure of installing E2k and the E2K
ADC on a DC GC server AND connected to an existing 5.5 site through the
ADC?
My problem is this: I
cannot get Exchange 55 to update its GAL with the newly created users in AD
with E2K mailboxes and I cannot send mail from 5.5
Title: Message
Nope
- no new internet connection. ISA in Office A would then forward requests to ISA
in office B - its called chained proxy. The big advantage is that you're
avoiding WAN traffic.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MCSE Sr
Title: Message
Roger,
I do
agree that avoiding a domain for 25 people is a good practice. But, if the
replication traffic is the biggest contributor, then it might be an option
(though not a top one). He clearly has sites set out appropriately, and
more tuning at the site level and site
Title: Message
I've
also noticed that the nic's in the two DC's are set to Auto and the routers are
set to auto - full duplex
I'm
guessing I should change these to 100mb full but I'm not sure how my
unix access points would act because they only support
10mb...grrr
Unix
is always getting i
Title: Message
Refreshing your minds...
2
sites:
Office
A = 25 clients - 1DC - subnet: 10.64.0.0/16
Office
B = 250 clients - 1DC, 1 E2K, 1 ISA (Internet and E-Mail site for both
locations) subnet 10.128.0.0/16
I know
for a fact that telnet gets high priority for traffic coming to Office
Title: Message
I
would avoid using a subdomain, especially for 25 people.
Refresh our minds on your sites and subnets layout. Are they all in one
site or are they two? It sounds like that might be part of the
issue.
Another option, and this might make a lot of sense, is to put another ISA
For more info on the security issue, see
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q255134
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:53:22 -0500
There is a fai
Thanks Greg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>If you have no other resources you have to do what you have to do
>Brahim.
>
>However, if you do in fact have other resources - it is advisable not to
>put DNS, DHCP, WINS on a DC - - not only are you going to be facing
>certain security issues - - but you
If possible, don't install DHCP on a DC, it's a security issue.
Regards,
/Jimmy
--
Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
www.qadvice.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brahim Bouchaiba
Sent: Tu
Thanks Roger.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>There is a fairly serious security issue with putting DHCP on a DC. We've
>taken to keeping WINS and DHCP separate from DC's under Win2k.
>
>--
>Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
>Sr. Systems Administrat
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:55
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Design Guidance
Casey,
It
would clearly resolve the replication issue. But, it's only going to
yeah Roger, I was just giving the others a reminder because it sounded to me like you
were on the right page :)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:16 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Design Guidance
Th
Title: Message
Rick,
There
are around 25 clients in Office A where the head server is
located.
Ideally I would like to increase the bandwidth on the line but failing
that, if we would move the DC that is there now back to our datacenter we
would structure so that our datacenter in Office
If you have no other resources you have to do what you have to do
Brahim.
However, if you do in fact have other resources - it is advisable not to
put DNS, DHCP, WINS on a DC - - not only are you going to be facing
certain security issues - - but you will also hamper performance
-Original Me
There is a fairly serious security issue with putting DHCP on a DC. We've
taken to keeping WINS and DHCP separate from DC's under Win2k.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> F
Hello everyone,
Is there in harm to have primary DC in single forrest act also as DHCP and
WINS server for the whole site ,beside the other roles ? thanks
Brahim Bouchaiba
Network administrator
Information technology
617-7359720
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ:
That's exactly my point - this issue, as was pointed out in the Q article
David Fugleberg posted, happens specifically in that case.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From:
36 matches
Mail list logo
