RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

2003-06-27 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message I would encourage organizations to consider a registry for Adam's or LDAP type directories.  You don't want to end up with the same mess NT 4 domains created for applications.  I would find out if the application does authentication via the directory, and if it does, encoura

Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

2003-06-27 Thread Glenn Corbett
Title: Message ADAM is also good for those applications that want to start doing some AD integration functionality without actually having to set up an AD forest.   Makes us Infrastructure guys nice and happy, don't have to keep setting up and pulling down AD forests every week or so for the

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name

2003-06-27 Thread Diane Ayers
Title: Message Big enough to be a PITA for a domain rename...  ;-) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. SmithSent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:10 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This particular environment is a dot com AND a fair-sized Windows-based ISP. They hav

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name

2003-06-27 Thread Michael B. Smith
Title: Message This particular environment is a dot com AND a fair-sized Windows-based ISP. They have almost 200 "real" servers (i.e., separate units in racks) and another 100 blade servers. The desktop environment is trivial -- less than a hundred desktops. A domain rename would be a nightm

Re: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name

2003-06-27 Thread jim . katoe
Title: Message We will check this 1st thing Monday,thanks for the heads up.--Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld  - Original Message -  From: ActiveDir-owner  Sent: 06/27/2003 05:44 PM  To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad"

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name

2003-06-27 Thread Diane Ayers
Title: Message I'm not sure of the scale of your environment.  If smallish and/or you have the resources, it is possible to rename your NT 4.0 domain.  All clients that are a member of the domain will have to rejoin the domain after the rename.  This gets ugly if your environment is large or

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name

2003-06-27 Thread Michael B. Smith
Title: Message EXCEPT I can't have my AD name the same as the netbios name!   But cool. Thanks for your input (and that of others on the list). VERY helpful. -Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:50 PMTo: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name

2003-06-27 Thread Michael B. Smith
Title: Message Great info. Thanks. -Original Message-From: Jef Kazimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:53 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name Sorry I didn’t realize you were doing an “inplace

[ActiveDir] Password Complexity

2003-06-27 Thread Simpsen, Paul A.
In July we are going to enable password complexity. I know I’ve seen issues with this on the list but am unable to connect to the archives. I believe the issue was that if your old pw didn’t meet the requirements then you were unable to change your pw. Is this correct and has anyone experie

RE: [ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions.... Chicken or Egg

2003-06-27 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message Thanks Benton...   Todd -Original Message-From: Benton Wink {winkb} [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:08 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions Chicken or Egg You do NOT have to have

RE: [ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions.... Chicken or Egg

2003-06-27 Thread Benton Wink {winkb}
Title: Message You do NOT have to have the Server 2003 AD schema extensions for Exchange 2003.  You lose some minor functionality, nothing major.  We are currently in production with Exchange 2003 w/o Server 2003 AD.   Benton Chase Wink From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

[ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions.... Chicken or Egg

2003-06-27 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message We just learned that Exchange 2003 will be RTM next week.  And the Exchange lead is chomping at the bit to extend the schema for it.  We have two problems, we have not extended the schema for Windows 2003, and we have a site design that has some replication issues due to firew

Re: [ActiveDir] AD Question: Restricting Information From Users

2003-06-27 Thread jim . katoe
My way of figuring this out was by purchasing Inside Active Directory by Kouti & Seitsonen and reading Chapter 4 - it covers the subject well.   Basically you can assign permission to do what you ask. "Aaron I. Stahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/27/2003 09:48 AM Plea

RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

2003-06-27 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message I just talked to our MS guy and he said that syncing Exchange and AD's can be done with MMS 2003 on Windows 2003 Server.  If you want to use the other connectors like Oracle, IPlanet, EDirectory you need EE.   Todd -Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:

[ActiveDir] AD Question: Restricting Information From Users

2003-06-27 Thread Aaron I. Stahl
Title: Message Hello all, I have a question concerning viewing permissions in AD.  We would like to add user information (home phone, cell, address, etc.) to AD, however we do not want all users to be able to see this information.   We would like to restrict this information to Group Manage

RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

2003-06-27 Thread Duncan, Larry
Title: Message Another lower cost alternative that I've found is Imanami's Directory Transformation Manager (http://www.imanami.com). But, I've not have a chance to evaluate it yet. Is anyone here using DTM?     -Original Message- From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

2003-06-27 Thread Rick Kingslan
Title: Message IMHO, ADAM is the more exciting of the two.  Granted MMS is nice in what it does (been working with it on and off for a while) but ADAM is really a special product in what you can do with it.  For those of you that want to integrate your application, but don't want to go to the

[ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003

2003-06-27 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message I just got word that MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003 are shipping the week of July 3rd.   Now to afford the server requirements to run MMS 2003.   Requirements for MMS 2003   Windows 2003 EE SQL 2000 EE Visual Studio .NET 2003 Hardware   Makes Simple Sync look very attractive, but

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Todd Myrick - SearchWin2000.com's 2003 Innova tor Award winner

2003-06-27 Thread Rod Trent
Title: Message The TechTarget people are like that.  You have to be very specific with them, telling them exactly what they can and can't use. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:32 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [ActiveDir] MS SharePoint Server

2003-06-27 Thread Joe
Title: Message You probably want to look at the microsoft.public.sharepoint.* and microsoft.public.sharepointportalserver.* newsgroups through your local News Server or news.microsoft.com for suggestions/help on that product.       joe   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [ActiveDir] MS SharePoint Server

2003-06-27 Thread William Lefkovics
Title: Message http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepoint as well.   William From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoeSent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:37 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MS SharePoint Server You probably want to look

RE: [ActiveDir] MS SharePoint Server

2003-06-27 Thread Martin Tuip
As William Lefkovics answered on the E2k list. Sharepoint is *A* solution for you.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepoint     Tony .. can we make a FAQ with links to other lists and sites for things that aren't related to Active Directory so that we can only discuss AD here?         Martin

[ActiveDir] MS SharePoint Server

2003-06-27 Thread Jochen Andries
Hello,   Is there anybody out there who has got experience with MS SharePoint Server I’m looking for a solution :   We have several “maps”, all numbered.  In these maps are some documents (offer, offer-confirmation, worksheet, …).  Now, it’s a soup.  You can find some (digital, no