RE: [ActiveDir] AD Protected groups

2004-02-13 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
Hi Joe, I've seen your DC numbers in the past (~400) and wonder how just two guys can keep all that hardware going!? While we have many fewer DCs and servers (dozens), the two of us that work on them seem to have our hands full. 'Course we're also involved with other things besides

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-004

2004-02-13 Thread Roger Seielstad
Let me ask you this - are they accessing OWA over an SSL connection? Not that it matters - since you're encapsulating the username and password as part of the URL, its not secure. IIRC, the URL is NEVER encrypted via SSL. So, you're passing username and password in clear text.

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-004

2004-02-13 Thread Roger Seielstad
You should be able to rewrite the button to post their username and password rather than URL encapsulate that data. I know one of our cross-system apps does that. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-004

2004-02-13 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
We realize that however with Exchange 5.5 there is really no other way that we are aware of until we migrate to Exchange 2003 which is getting under way. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:12 AM To: '[EMAIL

[ActiveDir] Windows 2000 SP 4

2004-02-13 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
I still have yet to install SP4. Wanted to wait to see what everyones experiences were with it first. Does everyone feel pretty comfortable with SP4? I heard something like SP 5 was out but haven't seen anything on it. Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2000 SP 4

2004-02-13 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
SP 4 is pretty stable; there is one post SP4 hot fixes that should be applied to AD DC's specifically.(KB828297) (Updates LSASS and components related to it. http://itc.uncc.edu/steve/weblog/archives/001757.html Here is a weblog post that is a pretty good synthesis. KB Article 828297:

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2000 SP 4

2004-02-13 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
Thanks -Original Message- From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2000 SP 4 SP 4 is pretty stable; there is one post SP4 hot fixes that should be applied to AD

RE: [ActiveDir] Suppress reboot of windows update???

2004-02-13 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message http://www.susserver.com/FAQs/FAQ-AutoUpdateSettings.asp The setting you want is called NoAutoRebootWithLoggedOnUsers -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.

RE: [ActiveDir] Event 13562 errors on FRS

2004-02-13 Thread Mulnick, Al
Best practice is to start with ensuring that name resolution is sound. Netdiag, dcdiag, dnslint are several tools that might be helpful for this. Also, here's a reference link to some other folks that had similar: http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=6702eventno=294 Can you post the

[ActiveDir] DCPromo

2004-02-13 Thread Guy Teverovsky
Yesterday, while dcpromoing a machine (which was already domain member), I have noticed that while the LDAP session was initiated against PDCE in site A, the computer account move to Domain Controllers OU was performed on a DC in site B. Although after the replication everything was nice and

RE: [ActiveDir] Event 13562 errors on FRS

2004-02-13 Thread Bruce Clingaman
My domain is not connected to the Internet, I think dnslint will not work. Attached is dcdiag and netdiag in diag.txt I am still getting FRS 13570 once a day. I can connect to Event Viewer remotely from other DCs. All machines' have DNS entries. Thanks From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ActiveDir] MS04-007 checking

2004-02-13 Thread rmcdonald
Does anyone know of a tool to make sure that all the users have this patch applied? I know Microsoft had something for the Blaster and was wondering if anyone has anything that would check to make sure this patch has been applied? Thanks again Ryan McDonald

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-007 checking

2004-02-13 Thread William Lefkovics
The Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer should be able to check for this. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=""> Or a third party vulnerability assessment tool, such as Retina from www.eeye.com (the folks that discovered MS04-007). William Lefkovics eEye Digital

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-007 checking

2004-02-13 Thread Charlie Kaiser
Title: Message HFNetChk. The MS hotfix tool. It's now the MBSA or something like that. I like the command line version, but I also use HFNetChkPro from Shavlik. It's OK, but the MS version is quick and easy to use. You can scan your whole domain with it pretty quickly. Available from MS...

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-007 checking

2004-02-13 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
Might check with RetinA (www.eeye.com). We're using Patchlink to not only detect, but patch and deploy software as well. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:06 AMTo: [EMAIL

[ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Niklas Wikander
I'm preparing an upgrade of a NT domain to a W2k domain. The scenario: I have one NT PDC and one NT BDC in my domain TEST. In the TEST domain I have one W2kclient. Everything works great. I upgrade the PDC to W2k DC and with the upgrade I also install DNS on the DC and name the domain

RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Naming Server FSOM

2004-02-13 Thread Bernard, Aric
It is possible that your member server on boot utilized the DNM DC as its authentication server. When you try and logon as a user by default you will attempt to authenticate to the same DC as the machine authenticated to assuming of course the user and computer object are members of the same

RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Naming Server FSOM

2004-02-13 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
The lag is only about 3 or 4 minutes. I have not tested workstations since there are non in that AD Site. -Original Message- From: Bernard, Aric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 1:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Naming

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Niklas- See if this helps: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;298713 Hunter -Original Message- From: Niklas Wikander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when

RE: [ActiveDir] Event 13562 errors on FRS

2004-02-13 Thread Mulnick, Al
Are your SYSVOL directories properly shared out? Can one of the DC's connect to the other SYSVOL properly (check to see if they are shared out properly and that you can browse to it from the opposite DC; both directions would be good). Have you restarted the FRS service to see if that has

RE: [ActiveDir] Event 13562 errors on FRS

2004-02-13 Thread Rich Milburn
Try repadmin /showrepl and dcdiag /test:replications we had an issue recently that sounds a little different from yours, but we had to use netdom to resync one of the DCs machine passwords. Replication was failing with Access Denied and User does not have the requested logon type errors

SV: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Niklas Wikander
Hunter, That was a good article but didn't help me in my case. My problem is that the computer account is missing in server manager when the DC is down, and therefore the W2kclient cannot login. Thanks anyway -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Coleman, Hunter

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Charlie Kaiser
Title: Message Check DNS to see if the SRV records for the BDC are available; also verify that the BDC is properly registered in WINS if you have WINS running. Sounds like only the W2K DC is registered in DNS maybe? You should be able to do a NSLOOKUP on the domain name and resolve all the

[ActiveDir] Extend schema to include eduperson?

2004-02-13 Thread Wehner, Paul (wehnerpl)
Anyone have any experience extending the Win2003 schema to be compliant with the eduperson schema? I'm having trouble trying to import the ldif file. Any hints, sites, whitepapers out there I've missed? (1) thanks, Paul Wehner Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 2000 SP 4

2004-02-13 Thread Santhosh Sivarajan
I had a bad experience with SP4. Here is KB article. Good luck! http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827531 Santhosh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:12 AM To:

SV: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Niklas Wikander
In my case the DNS is not available because the DC is down. WINS is installed on the BDC and it is registered. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: fr 2004-02-13 20:34 Till: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [ActiveDir] Event 13562 errors on FRS

2004-02-13 Thread Bruce Clingaman
I can browse to other sysvol from all DCs. Replication is working on Netlogon, I dropped a file and it appeared immediately on the other DCs. Restarting FRS seemed to have no effect. Replmon gave no FRS errors. Thanks Al. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Santhosh Sivarajan
Sounds like a DNS issue. What is your DNS config on workstation, PDC and BDC? Santhosh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niklas Wikander Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K not

SV: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Niklas Wikander
The DC, BDC and W2kclient all points to the DNS on the DC. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Santhosh Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: fr 2004-02-13 22:00 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopia: Ämne: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Charlie Kaiser
Title: Message I think you're going to need working DNS in order to contact a DC in an AD domain. Maybe configure the BDC as a DNS server for the DNS domain. If the DNS domain is AD-integrated, I think you can set up an NT DNS box as a secondary to that AD-integrated zone. I haven't had to

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread Santhosh Sivarajan
Title: Message Yep. You need a DNS server and you can configure an NT box as a secondary.  Configure a secondary DNS zone on the BDC and try again! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:04 PM To: '[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Another scripting question - long

2004-02-13 Thread Charlie Kaiser
I've solved the problem with the script that wouldn't run on XP, after exhaustive searches and trying all sorts of things with the script. I tried reinstalling WSH 5.6 with no success. I then reinstalled MDAC 2.8, and that fixed it! Now I can get back to getting this script to go out and talk to

Re: [ActiveDir] DCPromo

2004-02-13 Thread rrutherford
Im sure a Dcpromo will always hook back to the PDCE... that should be normal. I'm not really sure what you want to find out please elaborate. Rob Guy Teverovsky

RE: [ActiveDir] W2K not authenticated by NT4 BDC when DC is down.

2004-02-13 Thread joe
It has been several years since I have played with NT and 2K DCs side by side but I seem to recall that once a W2K client finds a W2K Server it won't go back and use an NT4 server. I.E. No failback. That may not be the case anymore with the various SP's as my experiences were SP0 but worth

RE: [ActiveDir] MS04-007 checking

2004-02-13 Thread joe
If you want to anonymously scan I would check the the eeye site, they probably have something. Additionally you could write a script to loop through doing srvinfo's against the machines and pull the info out. If you don't mind using admin rights, you couldwrite a script that went through

RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed Exchange and Mixed AD Modes

2004-02-13 Thread joe
Title: Message People were scared of change. Change should cause concern but only enough to make sure the change is done correctly. Some people take it a bit far and use it as an excuse to never move forward. We have a ton of people in our company who feel we never should have come down out

RE: [ActiveDir] Extend schema to include eduperson?

2004-02-13 Thread joe
Never even heard of it but if you post the errors here possibly someone can give some suggestions. For AD specific LDAP scripting I would recommend Robbie Allen's book - AD Cookbook. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wehner,

RE: [ActiveDir] DCPromo

2004-02-13 Thread joe
What site was the machine that was being promoted to in? I would expect it was in site B. The change should be done on the machine that it did its initial replication with. How do you know that it did that replication with the PDC? Is this info from the dcpromo log? joe -Original

[ActiveDir] DFS issue?

2004-02-13 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
I'm having a problem with some INI files located in users terminal server home directories, which are stored on a DFS share not unlocking when the users log off my Citrix servers. Has anyone seen anything like this? The next time the user logs on, their INI file is still locked open, and their

[ActiveDir] NTP

2004-02-13 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
What's everyone syncing all their clocks up with? Do Win2k AD domain controllers automatically respond to SNTP requests? We are currently running a firewall that acts as a NTP server for all our internal PCs (Symantec Enterprise FW) and we're looking at switching to a NetScreen firewall which

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Protected groups

2004-02-13 Thread joe
The team is three people + a manager. I am one of the three people but I never get to work on stuff anymore, I am constantly being dragged into meetings to point out things that aren't right so people can get mad at me for pointing out the things that aren't right. I am also the shield for the

RE: [ActiveDir] Delegating Access to the AD Deleted Items container...

2004-02-13 Thread joe
Title: Message I spoke with MS Alliance PSS about this exact issue with the ADC... This is possible in W2K, however it is completely unsupported and the directions I saw were painful and I said, NFW. The min permissions requires are Admin, not domain admin with this. "Allegedly" MS said

RE: [ActiveDir] NTP

2004-02-13 Thread Rick Kingslan
Russ, I point two of our corp level Linux DNS boxes to tick.usno.navy.mil and tock.usno.navy.mil and create a quorum with these. The PDCE is then pointed to the DNS servers. Our other Windows 2kX DCs will synch off of the PDCE. Repeat for each domain. When you ask if a Win2k DC will respond to

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Protected groups

2004-02-13 Thread joe
Title: AD Protected groups I have gotten A LOT of offline responses to this post. I am concerned at the responses however... I am getting several responsesof "well you were allowed to set it up right" or "your management is helping you" etc... Folks, management isn't helping with much at

RE: [ActiveDir] NTP

2004-02-13 Thread joe
Hey Rick's back in town... :o) I will add to his response. Hard set the Forest Root DCs that have the most likely chance of being the PDCs plus obviously the current Root PDC to some reliable source, in Rick's case the DNS Servers. Some people will use core routers. Next clear the SNTP address

RE: [ActiveDir] NTP

2004-02-13 Thread Free, Bob
Rimmerman, Russ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's everyone syncing all their clocks up with? We have our own enterprise NTP servers, the forest root DCs synch to them. Everything else in AD is in NT5DS mode and time flows down the domain hierarchy. The [gag] remaining NT boxes, have