Thanks for reply!
Ok, I will,but it would be in Russian.
Тип события(Event Type):Ошибка (Translation - Error)
Источник события(Event Source): NTDS General
Категория события(Event Category): (9)
Код события(Event id): 1049
Дата: 29.12.2004
Время: 8:47:13
Пользовате
I don't see any event in Event viewer. This has start happening from
last 2-3 weeks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ASB
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 11:09 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 logon
Check the EventLogs on that server...
Also, when did this start happening?
-ASB
FAST, CHEAP, SECURE: Pick Any TWO
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:42:25 +0530, Tashildar, Dinesh (Cognizant)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> If we try to logon to the Windows 2003 serv
We used to have systems that had many different NIC drivers loaded so that the
same image could be used on several different hardware platforms and I'd get
these messages sporadically. Turns out the fix was changing auto-negotiate to
100Full on the NIC and the switch.
We've recreated our imag
Title: Windows 2003 logon console issue.
If we try to logon to the Windows 2003 server at the console and found user name and password is grayed out. The server/domain name is white box, which is normal. The only solution to come out of it is hard boot.
I have tried to find solution on inte
First, I'd point out that 5 is a pretty low number. Considering that some
applications will try more than once for a single password provided by the end
user, you might want to consider going up to a value that is at least 15. From
a security perspective, consider that going to something that is
We tried setting the “Account lockout threshold”
to 5 attempts in our Default Domain policy. Once it propagated across to
various servers, we found that some of the local accounts (i.e. Administrator,
IUSR, SMS, etc) accounts were getting locked out. We’ve been on the
phon
Hi,
try:
NETDOM QUERY DC (all DCs in a domain)
NLTEST /DCLIST: (all DCs in a domain)
With NSLOOKUP (default OS command line) you can do name resolution from
DNS->IP
With NBLOOKUP (additional dload from MS) you can do name resolution from
NetBIOS->IP
NETDOM QUERY FSMO will retrieve the FSMO role
Hi there,
Is this a Dell box? If so update the NIC driver. Is the card 1000mbps?
If so, try lowing it back to 100mbps. I had the same problem on Dell boxes
that were 1000mbps. Once I updated the driver and lowered the speed to
100mbps all 1054 errors went away.
Cheers,
George
-Original
M
Try, enabling the Wait For Network, GPO, by default
XP does a Fast Boot, which does not wait for GPO settings, by default, this can
be seen on switched networks, if you hook the PC up to a HUB you probably wont
get this error, it is not processing the GPO because it hasnt "officially"
logged
Does the PC have a Gig NIC card?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326152
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/30/2004 10:26:49 AM >>>
I had this problem on a PC and I fixed it by simply
updating the NIC
driver. Have you tried this?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
Duh, can't believe I didn't realize that. It works now, thank you.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Schofield
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 6:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Software Deploymen
I had this problem on a PC and I fixed it by simply
updating the NIC driver. Have you tried this?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 11:31 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] GP
Title: Message
I would check the DNS suffix and see if
that may be the issue. Also, check the Register this connection and use this
connections DNS suffix in DNS registration. (just a thought)
Thanks,
S
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Ma
Group,
Does anyone have any information about
this event? It appears to be a warning, from the AD Topology Discovery source,
with an event of 24000. The only thing that I have seen is that it has failed
to get the PDC Master for the domain “forestDNSZones.domain.com”.
This will caus
Title: Message
If its just one system, then you might try
just re-joining the machine to the domain. Perhaps its machine account got
fudged up. You might check its system event log for Netlogon errors that give
some clue to this.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
They are one in the same. MSDN seems to be
giving it a pretty name. I don’t know why, I never noticed that before.
MSDN appears to be documenting the default
in AD, not the net result after applying the Exchange schema extensions. That’s
why it says false, when Exchange flips it to true
Title: Message
I have also done a nslookup and can retrieve
srv records and name records easily.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004
11:50 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject
Title: Message
I did a set logonserver and got a response
of my domain controller so I am logged into the domain. But I am still
getting this error.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rogers, James
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 200
See I just knew it would make it to your blog, that is why
I helped out. :o)
Someone around here will probably throw it into a cookbook
too.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
SmithSent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 11:15 AMTo:
ActiveDir@
Title: Message
My DNS is working since ALL other
workstations have no problems, just this one.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004
11:50 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
Apparently I do not RC :-). Thanks for the info...does that
imply that isMemberOfpartialAttributeSet is not the same as "In Global Catalog"
referenced in http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
FleischmanSen
Title: Message
You're
absolutely right, my apologies.
-James
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Darren Mar-EliaSent: Thursday, December 30,
2004 11:50 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [FNB Spam Filter][Activ
And for completeness (schema5.ldf)
dn:
CN=Proxy-Addresses,changetype: modifyreplace:
searchFlagssearchFlags: 13-
I have submitted a request to MSDN to put some kind of info
in the schema page for that attribute that it is updated by Exchange.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
Title: Message
James-
I think you mean LMHosts right? I'm not aware that
etc/hosts allows NetBIOS records like that. In any case, I don't think that will
help because GP processing is strictly LDAP based--there is no use of NetBIOS
protocols to find or process GPOs. That is why, in an environ
All are working
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004
11:36 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO
Processing
DNS name resolution?
IP connectivity to DC?
Justin-
This error can happen for any number of reasons. Inability
to resolve LDAP srv records via DNS can be one issue. I would double-check that
the DNS references on this client are correct. Assuming that is not the problem,
I found this very useful and fairly recent KB article that descri
Title: Message
As a
trouble-shooting method, try creating a #DOM record in your HOST file that
points at the domain controller. If this works, you most likely have a DNS
problem.
-James
R. Rogers
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Be
DNS name resolution?
IP connectivity to DC?
-gil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin
A.Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 9:31 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] GPO
Processing
I keep getting these errors on my
Windows XP
I keep getting these errors on my Windows XP SP 1 Computer.
I have rebuilt the machine twice and have put on XP SP2 and XP SP1a and the
results are always the same, I have replaced the NIC and the Cable it uses to
connect to the network and can’t seem to figure out what is going on.
Any h
From Exchange forest prep (schema0.ldf):
dn:
CN=Proxy-Addresses,
changetype: modify
replace: isMemberOfPartialAttributeSet
isMemberOfPartialAttributeSet: TRUE
-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004
10:0
Heck, I've got more than 1,000 myself, just not in my test
environment. Here it is, fixed for paging and for only looking at the
proxyaddresses attribute. I didn't do your performance optimization.
:-) I did clean it up a tiny bit too, so I'd feel ok putting it on my
blog.
Oh, and as alway
When I read this I was like huh?
I admit to not even knowing that proxyAddresses was in the
default schema, been too long since I have seen an untainted schema. I thought
Exchange put it there. Exchange must simply add proxyAddresses to the
PAS and tell it to be preserved through tombstonin
Excellent, thanks Vladimir. I had heard of the issue but
not that a solution other then removing the objectclass index had been put
forth. I am a great fan of indexing objectclass and it is one of the first
things I tell people to do so of course I didn't like the removing the
objectclass in
yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ellis, Debbie
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004
10:14 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] SUS
We are going to deploy SUS sometimes
soon. Can patches be deployed to mach
IIRC, proxyAddresses isn't in the default GC attribute set,
so in a multi-domain forest you may be missing dupes. In that case, you
could either include proxyAddresses in the partial attribute set or loop through
a list of the domains and query each domain.
Hunter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep.
The SUS Deployment guide is pretty good. I do recommend
reading it prior to deploying.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ellis,
DebbieSent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 10:14 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir]
SUS
We are going to de
We are going to deploy SUS sometimes soon. Can patches be
deployed to machines while the user is logged off but the machine is turned on?
Can you please paste the entire event message in to an email and
reply-all with it? Please use the event viewer copy button so we get it
as-is with no typo's nor language changes.
Thanks!
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Procenk
Well, I felt
like providing some response
Here is the
story. EDM web interface allows you to sort by a particular attribute if you
click on column caption. Column captions are “clickable” only for
the attributes which are indexed in active directory. One our customer (and Joe
pro
:o)
Good job Michael. Honestly I am sure quite a few people are
happy and thinking, god I hate that perl crap[1] You have offered an
alternative. ;o)
As for your filter your filter is fine if
the audit is only against users. If you also want to check the addresses of
groups and c
41 matches
Mail list logo
