> Is this expected? Or should I be getting a different output?
Expected.
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:35 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] 2003 Native - gp
Hi,
This is expected behavior.
It should either be changed to the exact domain type or it should state
something like Windows 200x or Windows 200x based
Cheers,
#JORGE#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 4/25/2005 1:34 AM
Subject: [ActiveDi
Hello guys,
I know this is slightly out of topic but any help will be appreciated.
I have just installed MOM 2005 on a windows 2003 machine, and it seems
to be working fine. The servers I want to monitor are all Win2k3
machines. When I install agents on these servers the installation is
seen to b
On 4/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> KB
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;298143
Excellent! Thank you all!
Good morning to you.
...D
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: h
I'd like to solicit a little advice on our AD design with respect to DNS. We
have an "empty" forest
root domain, and two subdomains. Each domain has at least 3 DCs, two in the
main subnet at our
corporate office, and one in a remote office. All DCs have DNS installed, all
AD-integrated. Each DC'
We have a new AD Controller that we recently deployed
in a remote office.
Before it was deployed someone connected it to the network and it appears
in the server list for the main office. Now thats its deployed in
the
remote office, it appears in both our main office site and the remote
offic
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Checking who deleted Files
Thank you Peter and Jose your info is very helpful I have enabled it and no it’s time to play the waiting game :)
Aaron
On 4/21/05 11:29 PM, "Peter Jessop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
More specifically:
To detect file deletion you must audit S
Thanks for the tip.
However only Outlook Express is available in the Dropdown. Must I install
Outlook on the Server?
N.A.G
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aaron Visser
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:08 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.or
Have you tried deleting it using ADSIEdit.
See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318698
Regards
Peter Jessop
you don't mention OS version - I'm assuming you will or have implemented
Win2k3. In this case the "island-problem" (which used to be an issue in
a Win2k AD's root domain) is no longer an issue and you're fine to go
ahead with your option 3.
I would also recommend to setup the _msdcs subzone of th
Oops, sorry. I did forget. It's all Win2K. We're probably a while away from
2003 Guido. What's the
recommendation in that case?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Grillenmeier, Guido
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 4:00 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.act
Thanks to everyone for the help moving
the server site.
Now I have another issue, when I look
at the event log for the server at the remote location, in the security
log, it has a lot of entries like this:
User Logoff:
User
Name: mes
Domain:
WVS
In case any of you with Trend AV have experienced this issue... It hit one of
my machines Friday afternoon...
Take a close look at their fixes... Looks like a hole big enough to drive a
truck through for a few hours...
**
Charlie Kaiser
MCSE, CCNA
Systems Engineer
Essex Cre
Is there a way to determine if forest and domain prep were run without
trying to install Exchange 2003?
Thanks,
Charlie
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
:\SUPPORT\EXDEPLOY\EXDEPLOY.EXE /t:orgprepcheck
Where is your CD-ROM for Exchange 2003 Server.
> notepad c:\exdeploy logs\exdeploy.log
To examine the logfile.
If orgcheck passes, then forestprep and domainprep have been run.
More information regarding manually verifying that the forestprep an
Thanks for your previous expertise, I am hoping you can help
again.
We have Exchange 2003 setup and running with our W2K AD. We have
created Distribution groups and QBDG's. We can send mail to both
addresses, but can not find either group in the Global Address List or the All
Groups list
5.5
server accounts should still see them but 2003 clients will see a very different
view. After migration the global view has to be re-created. The drop downs
won't show until you place them back in. I don't know of an automated method for
doing this as we have been doing it manually.
Che
Hello ;-)
Do you have the same trouble with every mailbox/mail enabled users and contacts
? or is this problem appears only for distribution groups (DG)?
If this is a general problem,
1) Check if the Recipient Update Services(RUS) is running in "always execute"
mode. Go to "your Organisatio
Title: How to determine which is the default site
Yeah, if you don’t have one numbered
in the low thousands, then it’s gone. I wonder which method he finally
picked? Maybe he doesn’t care anymore.
Wook
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent:
Thanks for confirming Jorge, thought I did something wrong somewhere...
:)
Thank you and have a splendid day!
Kind Regards,
Freddy Hartono
Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security)
Spherion Technology Group, Singapore
For Agilent Technologies
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message--
Be careful with deleting the DC using ADSI edit because it is still a
valid DC. Did you try moving the DC to the branch office Site?
Try this..
Expand main office site -> Server
Right click on the Server and select Move.
HTH
Santhosh
Santhosh Sivarajan
MCSE(W2K3/W2K/NT4),MCSA(W2K3/W2K/MSG),CCN
>>3. Each DC has itself as primary, and a partner DC in the same domain as secondary; no root DC defined
My favorite:
4. One DC in each domain is chosen as primary for every server in that domain, and each DC points to itself as secondary; All DCs in the child domains use the servers in the root
ah - that changes the picture
option 3 is still valid for child DCs (DCs point to themselves + another
DC of the same domain), but you should either add a secondary of _msdcs
subzone of the root (i.e make this it's own zone) or - if the root zone
itself is not too large - add a secondary of the ro
23 matches
Mail list logo